We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 517

Impression Products v. Lexmark: How can sellers protect themselves after their patent rights are exhausted? Two examples and one warning
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • November 14 2017

I was on a panel at the Patent Law in Global Perspectives Seminar on October 20 at Stanford Law School, discussing the implications of Impression


Impression Products v. Lexmark Intl
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 3 2017

In late May, the Supreme Court of the U.S. (SCOTUS) issued its long-awaited decision in Impression Products v. Lexmark Intl. In Impression Products


Lexmark Creates Problems for Licensors and Sellers of Patented Products
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • October 2 2017

The most important patent-antitrust case in recent years is not an antitrust case but is the United States Supreme Court's May 2017 decision in


专利权利用尽和制药业
  • Dilworth IP
  • USA
  • September 28 2017

5月30日最高法院在Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International


Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.: Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion Limits Restraints on Alienation of Goods
  • Morgan Lewis
  • USA
  • August 4 2017

The US Patent Act gives patent holders the right to prevent others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention in the United


Jones Day’s Review of Business-Related Cases in the Supreme Court’s October Term 2016
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • July 19 2017

During what many have labeled a "quiet Term," the U.S. Supreme Court, working with only eight justices for most of the session, still delivered at


Supreme Court Embraces Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • July 13 2017

On May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. again reversed the Federal Circuit and wholeheartedly


Supreme Court Ruling: Impression Products v. Lexmark International
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2017

In its May 30, 2017 decision in Impression Products v. Lexmark International, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded the scope of the patent exhaustion


Exhaustion and the “Right to Repair”: Ownership Rights after Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Intern., Inc.
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Hailed by some as the “right to repair”, on May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court ruled that a seller’s patent rights are not valid beyond the first sale of


The Patent Exhaustion Doctrine and the Bilateral Effects on the American-Vietnamese Marketplace
  • Baker McKenzie
  • USA, Vietnam
  • June 20 2017

On 30 May 2017, the United States Supreme Court released an important decision on Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., which