We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 500

Lower courts navigate Supreme Court's patent exhaustion decision
  • Dentons
  • USA
  • December 20 2017

On May 30, 2017, the US Supreme Court issued its influential decision in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark, Int’l, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1523 (2017

Impression Products v. Lexmark: How can sellers protect themselves after their patent rights are exhausted? Two examples and one warning
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • November 14 2017

I was on a panel at the Patent Law in Global Perspectives Seminar on October 20 at Stanford Law School, discussing the implications of Impression

Impression Products v. Lexmark Intl
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 3 2017

In late May, the Supreme Court of the U.S. (SCOTUS) issued its long-awaited decision in Impression Products v. Lexmark Intl. In Impression Products

Lexmark Creates Problems for Licensors and Sellers of Patented Products
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • October 2 2017

The most important patent-antitrust case in recent years is not an antitrust case but is the United States Supreme Court's May 2017 decision in

  • Dilworth IP
  • USA
  • September 28 2017

5月30日最高法院在Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International

Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.: Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion Limits Restraints on Alienation of Goods
  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2017

The US Patent Act gives patent holders the right to prevent others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention in the United

Jones Day’s Review of Business-Related Cases in the Supreme Court’s October Term 2016
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • July 19 2017

During what many have labeled a "quiet Term," the U.S. Supreme Court, working with only eight justices for most of the session, still delivered at

Supreme Court Embraces Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • July 13 2017

On May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. again reversed the Federal Circuit and wholeheartedly

Supreme Court Ruling: Impression Products v. Lexmark International
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2017

In its May 30, 2017 decision in Impression Products v. Lexmark International, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded the scope of the patent exhaustion

Exhaustion and the “Right to Repair”: Ownership Rights after Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Intern., Inc.
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Hailed by some as the “right to repair”, on May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court ruled that a seller’s patent rights are not valid beyond the first sale of