We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 37

Judge Can’t Find Infringement in Camouflage Shoe-Sole Patent Case
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • USA
  • February 29 2016

On February 19, 2016, District Judge Paul A. Crotty granted defendant Attilio Giusti Leombruni S.P.A.'s ("AGL's") motion to dismiss the patent


Insufficient evidence of substantial revenue derived in Georgia to support camouflage copyright infringement claim
  • Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
  • USA
  • May 29 2014

As previously reported here, Jordan Outdoor Enterprises, Ltd. ("Jordan"), asserted copyright infringement and unfair competition against Hubei Wild


Jury left to decide if camouflage patterns have specific protectable elements
  • Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
  • USA
  • February 19 2014

Judge Land denied the summary judgment motion of Digital Concealment Systems, LLC ("Digital"), filed that its "A-TACS FG Camo" pattern does not


Financial institutions e-briefing: cyber crime and payment processing
  • Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP
  • United Arab Emirates
  • February 26 2013

A new federal decree has been issued in the United Arab Emirates in order to combat cyber crimes. Who commits the offence? The decree


In effort to not blend in with competition, Jordan Outdoor Enterprises Ltd. brings copyright action in Middle District over camouflage patterns
  • Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
  • USA
  • November 5 2012

Jordan Outdoor Enterprises Ltd. (“JOEL”), based in Columbus, Georgia, sued three competitors for copyright infringement of various camouflage designs


In the courts
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • February 28 2011

On February 22, 2011, a New Jersey appeals court affirmed a trial court's ruling that the Zoning Board of Adjustment of New Milford wrongly denied T-Mobile's application for site plan approval and the variances needed to construct a ninety-foot monopole


Purported trade secrets in a company's "supply chain and other business information" held not to have been misappropriated
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • June 18 2010

In a case brought by a seller of camouflage clothing against a competitor, the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana held recently that just because “something is confidential does not mean it is a trade secret,” and the court granted the defendants’ summary judgment motion


Toronto's G20 summit - lessons for employers about high-security events
  • Fasken
  • Canada
  • June 15 2010

The G20 Summit of world leaders will be in Toronto on June 26 and 27, 2010


Québec's Bill 60: new rules for payment cards, extended warranties and long-term service contracts
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • May 13 2010

Bill 60, An Act to amend the Consumer Protection Act and other legislative provisions, introduces a new regulatory framework in Québec for three types of contracts in an attempt to curb perceived abuses: contracts involving sequential performance for a service provided at a distance (such as cell phone contracts), extended warranty contracts, and contracts for the purchase of prepaid cards (gift cards


Ministerial condition for a polymer of 1-butanol (a component of automobile coating and refinishing)
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • March 5 2010

Through a Government Notice issued in the December 5, 2009 Canada Gazette, Part I, the Ministers of Environment and Health have determined that 1-butanol, 2,2-bis(2-propenyloxy)methyl-, polymer with 1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisiloxane, 3-(2-hydroxyalkoxy) propyl-, ("1-Butanol") may be toxic