We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 145

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40
  • Stewart McKelvey
  • Canada
  • August 11 2016

Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable


Alberta v Elder Advocates of Alberta Society
  • WeirFoulds LLP
  • Canada
  • May 18 2011

In this unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the court determined that there is no fiduciary duty owed by the government to the plaintiffs.


Supreme Court finds coverage for construction defect claim
  • McMillan LLP
  • Canada
  • October 13 2010

In Progressive Homes Ltd v Lombard General Insurance Co. of Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a general contractor’s defective workmanship can constitute an “accident”, thereby triggering an insurance company’s duty to defend a general contractor against construction deficiency claims.


Michael Turrini
  • White & Case LLP

Elder C. Marques
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Justin R. Lambert
  • Bennett Jones LLP

Jonathan D. Meadows
  • Harper Grey LLP


Varoujan Arman
  • Blaney McMurtry LLP

Hartlee R. Zucker
  • Bennett Jones LLP