We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 57

Seventh Circuit Limits ADEA Protections for Job Applicants
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 29 2019

On January 23, 2019, the Seventh Circuit held that the ADEA’s prohibition of disparate impact discrimination do not extend to job applicants. Kleber


Podcast: Recent Developments in Title VII
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • March 28 2018

In this episode of The Proskauer Brief, senior counsel Harris Mufson and associate Laura Fant discuss the latest developments in Title VII. We will


Third Circuit Deepens Circuit Split Over Test for “Top Hat” Status Under ERISA
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • February 23 2018

A Third Circuit decision, Sikora v. UPMC, 876 F.3d 110 (3d Cir. 2017), deepens a circuit split over whether a participant’s bargaining power is


Seventh Circuit: EEOC May Continue Investigation After Dismissal of Private Lawsuit
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • August 24 2017

The Seventh Circuit recently concluded that the EEOC’s investigative powers do not end when a lawsuit related to the originating charge ends. EEOC v


Supreme Court Clarifies When Service by Mail is Permitted under the Hague Convention
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • July 12 2017

The Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (“Hague Service Convention” or


Are Taft-Hartley Boards Conflicted When Reviewing ERISA Benefits Determinations? Circuit Courts Are Split.
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2017

Although it has been nearly three decades since the Supreme Court first explained the appropriate standard of review for ERISA benefit claims, there


Third Circuit Permits ADEA “Subgroup” Claims
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • February 16 2017

The Third Circuit recently held in Karlo v. Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, No. 15-3435, 2017 WL 83385 (3d Cir. Jan. 10, 2017), that workers in their


Don’t Pick Me Off: Are Pre-Certification Claims Mooted By Deposited Full Settlement Offers?
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • August 22 2016

On January 20, 2016, the Supreme Court held in Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez, 136 S. Ct. 663, 672, 193 L. Ed. 2d 571 (2016) that an unaccepted


Wisconsin District Court Follows 5th Circuit: Internal Tipsters Are Not Considered “Whistleblowers” Under Dodd-Frank
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • August 16 2016

On August 12, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in Lamb v. Rockwell Automation Inc., No. 15-CV-1415-JPS (E.D. Wis


How much "competition", if any, is required to establish standing in Lanham Act false advertising casesthe Supreme Court may be interested in resolving the three-way circuit split
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • March 18 2013

Lanham Act false advertising law is largely consistent among the various Federal Circuit courts. However, one area of Lanham Act jurisprudence where