We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-3 of 3

Cat's paw: U.S. Supreme Court holds employers can be responsible for supervisors' discriminatory motives
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • USA
  • March 3 2011

After several years of conflicting lower court decisions, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Staub v. Proctor Hospital, finally offered clarifying guidance on when and whether a supervisor’s impermissible motive may be imputed to employers in employment discrimination cases.


Gregory S. Fisher
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP