We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 3,249

Security and asset classes in Peru
  • Miranda & Amado Abogados
  • Peru, Global
  • February 19 2018

A structured guide to security and asset classes in Peru

Invoice Finance 2018: Where next for bans on assignment?
  • Gowling WLG
  • United Kingdom
  • February 16 2018

Invoice finance provides crucial lifeblood to the financing of UK PLC. The last available full year figures for 2016 reported that an average of £9.5

Legislation Limits Out-of-class Assignments for CalPERS Members
  • Atkinson Andelson Loya Ruud & Romo
  • USA
  • January 17 2018

Effective January 1, 2018, Assembly Bill 1487 added section 20480 to the California Government Code, which limits "out-of-class" appointments by PERS

  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • September 25 2017

The original licensor, GNIC Arizona, assigned its rights under a trade mark licence to General Nutrition Investment Company (GNIC). GNIC Arizona was

Dealing with an application for consent to assign - when is it reasonable to say no?
  • Boodle Hatfield
  • United Kingdom
  • September 7 2017

If a lease is silent or simply states that a tenant may assign, then the tenant can assign without the need for the landlord's consent. In reality

Get it right the first time: real trade mark owner can’t be subbed into application by assignment
  • The Commercial Bar Association of Victoria
  • Australia
  • September 5 2017

It has been held that only an owner of a trade mark at the time the application is made can apply for registration, and that an applicant for a trade

Assignment of insurance indemnity leaves hole in excavator’s claim to recover losses
  • Barry.Nilsson. Lawyers
  • Australia
  • August 25 2017

The Queensland Supreme Court had to consider whether an excavation contractor's losses were covered under its subcontractor's insurance policy and

Athena Automation IPR decision rejecting equitable defense of assignor estoppel in IPR proceedings designated precedential by the PTAB
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • August 21 2017

On August 2, 2017, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) designated Section II.A. of the Institution Decision in Athena Automation Ltd. v. Husky

PTAB Designates Portion Of Assignor Estoppel Opinion As Precedential
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • August 5 2017

In October 2016, we posted about a Federal Circuit decision addressing whether assignor estoppel bars a party from filing an inter partes review

PTAB Designates New Precedent for AIA Trials
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • August 2 2017

The Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) has designated the following decision as precedential: Athena Automation Ltd v. Husky Injection Molding