We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 23,229

Forum Shopping - U.S. Supreme Court decision
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • August 16 2017

The U.S. Supreme Court held where a plaintiff's claims would be exactly the same even if the defendant had no forum contacts, there


Central District Of California Denies Motion To Dismiss Putative Securities Class Action Against El Pollo Loco Restaurant Chain, Finding Plaintiffs’ Allegations Purportedly Based On Confidential Witnesses Taken Together Raised Strong Inference Of Scienter
  • Shearman & Sterling LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2017

On August 4, 2017, United States District Judge David O. Carter of the United States District Court for the Central District of California denied a


California DFEH’s new transgender regulations go into effect
  • Dentons
  • USA
  • August 15 2017

Effective July 1, 2017, California employers became subject to new regulations, promulgated by the California Department of Fair Employment and


California Chief Counsel Ruling On Market-Based Sourcing - A Common (Sense?) Rule Emerges
  • Baker McKenzie
  • USA
  • August 15 2017

Earlier this year, the California Franchise Tax Board (the “FTB”) issued Chief Counsel Ruling 2017-01 (the “2017 Ruling”), which addresses the


No FEHA Violation for Refusing to Rescind Resignation of Disabled Employee
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2017

In Featherstone v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, a California appellate court dismissed claims by a disabled employee asserting


DFEH Publishes “Workplace Harassment Guide for California Employers”
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2017

In May, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing published a nine-page guide for employers to help clarify employer obligations around


The California Supreme Court, in Williams v. Marshalls of California, expanded the scope of information plaintiffs can obtain from employers in Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act actions.
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2017

PAGA (California Labor Code 2698 et. seq.) authorizes employees to file representative actions on behalf of themselves and other aggrieved


New Notice Requirement for Right to Domestic Violence Leave
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2017

As addressed in our Winter 2017 Update, effective July 1, Labor Code Section 230.1, which addresses time off for employees who are victims of domestic


San Francisco Expands Protections for Nursing Mothers and Female Job Applicants
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2017

Last month, San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee signed into law the Lactation in the Workplace Ordinance, which will apply to all employees within the city of


Another Chapter in California’s PAGA Saga
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 15 2017

California’s PAGA Saga continues with a pair of recently issued appellate decisions impacting these legally created class action-like lawsuits. What