We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 4,696

Duty of care owed by Arranger in relation to the execution of sukuk documents
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • January 16 2018

This case concerned the inability of the claimants to recover sums pursuant to a promissory note (the Promissory Note) which formed part of the


Healthcare briefing - Guidance on CANH withdrawal: Court of Protection
  • RadcliffesLeBrasseur
  • United Kingdom
  • January 16 2018

Guidance from the Court of Protection was, until recently, that withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) from patients in a


No Old Kentucky Home for Parallel FDCA-Based Tort Claims
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • January 15 2018

Several years ago, in a post entitled “Negligence Per Se Trivia,” we included the following: In Kentucky, negligence per se has been codified, and


Be Warned: Your Advice May Require a Warning!
  • Hardwicke
  • United Kingdom
  • January 15 2018

When should a solicitor provide a warning to their client that the advice they are giving may not be correct? That question was addressed by the Court


Claims for psychiatric injury alone
  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • United Kingdom
  • January 15 2018

We live in a society which positively encourages people to view mental health on the same terms as physical health in a bid to remove the stigma


Tiuta: lender claims in a bit of a mess
  • Hardwicke
  • United Kingdom
  • January 15 2018

The recent Supreme Court decision in Tiuta International Ltd (In Liquidation) v De Villiers Surveyors Ltd 2017 UKSC 77 creates quite a headache for


Expert witnesses and negligence - Riva Properties Limited v Foster Partners Limited
  • Hardwicke
  • United Kingdom
  • January 15 2018

Riva Properties Limited v Foster Partners Limited 2017 EWHC 2574 (TCC) is packed with delicious details - a world famous architectural firm versus


California Court of Appeal Limits Duty of Clinical Study Sponsor to Intervene in Treaters’ Care of Study Participants
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • January 12 2018

Last week, we took a short Western Caribbean cruise to celebrate a jarringly-advanced birthday. While the weather wasn’t an asset (it was 43 degrees


Supreme Court goes back to basics in negligent valuation claim
  • Kingsley Napley
  • United Kingdom
  • January 12 2018

The Supreme Court has gone back to basics in its approach to the assessment of damages in a claim involving a negligent valuation. The case in


Meningitis C Vaccine - Should the Government change the vaccination age?
  • Kingsley Napley
  • United Kingdom
  • January 11 2018

Meningitis is a life-threating infection. It strikes very quickly and unless it is treated promptly there can be devastating consequences including