We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 326,972

Louis Vuitton Malletier v Megastar Shipping Pte Ltd and other suits 2017 SGHC 305
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Singapore
  • January 22 2018

The Singapore High Court decision arose from claims for trade mark infringement by various trade mark proprietors (the "Plaintiffs") against a


Starbucks Corporation v Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha 2017 SGIPOS 18
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Singapore
  • January 22 2018

Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha (the "Applicant") applied for registration of the trade mark (the "Application Mark") for goods in Classes 29 and 30


The latest swaps litigation: the English High Court rules that the Bank of Scotland was entitled to exclude obligations by express agreement and the parties are bound by their agreement that there was no advisory relationship
  • Mayer Brown
  • United Kingdom
  • January 21 2018

The latest swaps mis-selling decision was handed down on 5 December 2017 in Marz Limited v Bank of Scotland Plc (2017). The High Court was required


Incorrect Ownership Certificates: A Cautionary Tale
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • January 19 2018

In a case which the judge deemed to be "a cautionary tale about how not to submit a planning application and its consequences", the High Court has


Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of SEC Administrative Judge Hiring Process
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • January 19 2018

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide a longstanding controversy regarding the validity of the appointment process for Securities and Exchange


Dental Device Class Action Comes Back To Bite Plaintiffs
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • January 19 2018

You don’t see class actions going to trial very often, but that is what happened in Patricia A. Murray Dental Corp. v. Dentsply International, Inc


L’AGCM ha siglato un Protocollo d’intesa con le Procure della Repubblica di Roma e di Milano. Le collaborazioni rafforzate con altre Amministrazioni e istituzioni. La prospettiva dei programmi di clemenza
  • De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani Studio Legale
  • Italy
  • January 19 2018

Nel gennaio 2018, l’Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) ha stipulato con le Procure della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Roma1


‘Over the top’ discipline: rethinking bullying in the public service
  • BAL Lawyers
  • Australia
  • January 19 2018

Recent cases show that bullying in the public service can take place through otherwise legitimate mechanisms, such as reassignment decisions and


Valve Ordered to Pay $3 Million for Misleading Australian Gamers on Steam
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • January 19 2018

The Full Court of the Australian Federal Court has, in Valve Corporation v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission 2017 FCAFC 224, upheld a


High Court of Australia dismisses builder’s application to appeal QBCC insurance payout
  • Cooper Grace Ward
  • Australia
  • January 19 2018

At the end of last year, the High Court of Australia, in Turcinovic v Queensland Building and Construction Commission 2017 HCASL 306, dismissed the