We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 14,767

Fifth Circuit Pins Down Insignia Ban
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • August 9 2018

The U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, affirmed a ruling from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) that a ban on pins violated


The State of Union FundingCalifornia and the Ninth Circuit Show How States Might Try To Mitigate The Effect of Janus
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • August 9 2018

By: Timothy Hoppe Seyfarth Synopsis: Labor friendly states will likely be looking for opportunities to lessen the financial blow of the Supreme


Massachusetts Enacts Expansive Paid Family and Medical Leave Legislation
  • Thompson Hine LLP
  • USA
  • August 8 2018

On June 28, 2018, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker signed into law House Bill 4640, “An Act Relative to Minimum Wage, Paid Family Medical Leave


Bonding with Baby Bumble
  • Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2018

EEOC and Estee Lauder recently settled a 2017 litigation matter alleging that the company discriminated against male employees because of and on the


More news from the NLRB on work rules
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2018

The Obama-era NLRB sometimes gave employers fits with decisions and guidance concerning employer work rules. It was common for the Obama-era Board to


In the PipelineHighlighting Changes of Interest to Employers in Australia
  • Jones Day
  • Australia
  • August 6 2018

Foodora delivery drivers are engaged under an independent contractor arrangement and are required to sign an "Independent Contractor Agreement" when


New York AG Hits Employer With $120K Fine for Violations
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • August 3 2018

The New York attorney general settled with an international retailer for violations of both the state and city "ban the box" laws for $120,000 in


California Supreme Court Leaves Open The Possibility Of A De Minimis Defense For Wage And Hour Claims - But Not Under The Facts Of This Case
  • Baker McKenzie
  • USA
  • August 2 2018

Last week, in Troester v. Starbucks Corporation (Case No. S234969), the California Supreme Court weighed in for the first time on the viability of a


How USDOL’s So-Called "20 Rule" Has Obscured the FLSA's Definition of a "Tipped Employee"
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • August 2 2018

Section 3(m) of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") permits an employer to take the "tip credit" for "tipped employees". Certain


FLSA De Minimis Defense Does Not Apply to California Wage Claims
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • July 31 2018

The California Supreme Court has ruled that California employers cannot rely on the federal de minimis doctrine to avoid claims for unpaid wages on