We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 13,529

What's the use? Understanding method vs. apparatus use infringement
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 28 2012

Every patent lawyer knows unauthorized use of a patent is infringement.


New rule for proving willful infringement and why opinions from patent counsel still matter after patent reform
  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • USA
  • January 28 2013

A finding of willful infringement in patent litigation is the nightmare scenario that all defendants fear because it allows the patent owner to


Italian Supreme Court news: the rise of the Italian Torpedo
  • Studio Legale Jacobacci & Associati
  • Italy
  • July 19 2013

A recent decision made public on June 25, 2013 by the Italian Supreme Court panel sitting in Unified Session (SCUS) has removed important barriers


When will the court allow an expedited trial?
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • September 5 2011

In the recent case of Warner-Lambert v Teva, the High Court considered the principles to be applied on an application for expedited trial.


Patent enforcement through the courts in France
  • CASALONGA
  • France, Global
  • September 3 2018

A structured guide to enforcing patents through the courts in France


Mobile app development: key contract issues
  • Morton Fraser
  • United Kingdom
  • September 28 2011

The development of bespoke mobile applications for businesses is currently experiencing a similar explosion in growth to that previously witnessed in e-commerce websites during the dotcom boom.


Don’t get spooked by means-plus-function ‘equivalents’
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2010

Patent attorneys often shudder when it comes to "means-plus-function" claims and the related term equivalents.


A successful parody: Louis Vuitton Malletier v Haute Diggity Dog
  • Venable LLP
  • USA
  • April 22 2008

In a decision that surprised many trademark owners (including the INTA which had filed an amicus brief in support of the trademark owner’s position), the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Haute Diggity Dog, 507 F.3d 252 (4th Cir. 2007), held that “Chewy Vuiton” for dog chew toys did not infringe or dilute the trademarks of Louis Vuitton, the high-end handbag manufacturer.


Patent enforcement through the courts in China
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • China, Global
  • October 2 2018

A structured guide to enforcing patents through the courts in China


Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v Newzbin Ltd 2010 EWHC 608 (Ch): major victory for film industry against online piracy
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • United Kingdom
  • June 3 2010

Mr Justice Kitchin's judgment in this case represents a major victory for the film industry against online piracy.