We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,070

When is a claimant protected from adverse costs?
  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • United Kingdom
  • July 6 2018

In the majority of injury claims, parties will attempt to negotiate a settlement rather than allowing the matter to proceed to trial. Part 36 is a


Looking to the future after life-changing motorbike crash
  • Stewarts
  • United Kingdom
  • July 5 2018

In June 2014, Greg McPherson, then 24, worked full time as an oil salesman in Norwich. He left work early one afternoon on his motorbike


Civil Liability Bill reaches the House of Commons
  • Boyes Turner LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 5 2018

The Civil Liability Bill, which will reform the way the personal injury discount rate is to be set in future, has now completed its passage through


Maternal birth injuries - what are they and what are the implications of this type of injury?
  • Leigh Day
  • United Kingdom
  • July 4 2018

Sadly we are seeing an increasing number of maternal birth injuries in the clinical negligence team at Leigh Day. Many of our clients who have these


Civil Liability Bill debate moves to House of Commons
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 3 2018

The Civil Liability Bill was passed for referral to the House of Commons by the Lords last week following the conclusion of the Third Reading stage


University student with severe head injuries after road traffic accident
  • Boyes Turner LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 3 2018

A 22 year old university student was a front seat passenger in a car driven by his friend who lost control in icy conditions and collided with a


Court of Appeal considers dishonesty and Part 36 interplay
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 2 2018

The Court of Appeal has found that a Defendant's Part 36 offer made in the knowledge of a Claimant's material non-disclosure did not alter the costs


Injury claims and contempt of Court
  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • United Kingdom
  • June 29 2018

I previously blogged on “Video Surveillance and Contempt of Court” and since, there has been another valuable lesson on how making intentionally


Fixed costs on claims commenced within the Portal, even if settlement order fails to record it
  • DAC Beachcroft
  • United Kingdom
  • June 27 2018

Claims commenced within the Low Value Protocols, which are not allocated to the multi-track, should be the subject of fixed calculable costs, as set


MIB’s ex turpi defence fails
  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • United Kingdom
  • June 26 2018

The Motor Insurer’s Bureau (MIB) failed to succeed in a defence of ex turpi causa non oritur actio in the sad case of Liam Clark v Darren Farley, MIB