We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 70

Intra-EU BITs, compatible with EU law? October 2017
  • HFW
  • Netherlands, Slovakia, Czech Republic, European Union
  • October 24 2017

In a somewhat surprising development but one that will be warmly welcomed by the international arbitration community, the Advocate General of the


BIT protections unaffected by EU law: Eastern Sugar BV v Czech Republic
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Netherlands, Czech Republic, European Union
  • January 8 2008

According to a tribunal constituted under the UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) Rules, protections enjoyed by foreign investors under the Czech-Netherlands Bilateral Investment Treaty are not superseded by the Czech Republic’s accession to the EU.


BIT protections unaffected by EU law
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Netherlands, Czech Republic
  • December 11 2007

Eastern Sugar B.V. v. Czech Republic: according to a tribunal constituted under the UNCITRAL Rules, protections enjoyed by foreign investors under the Czech-Netherlands Bilateral Investment Treaty are not superseded by the Czech Republic's accession to the EU.