We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 126

CJEU rules against arbitration clauses in Intra-EU Bilateral Investment Treaties
  • CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
  • Netherlands, Slovakia, Czech Republic, European Union
  • March 9 2018

On 6 March 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that Articles 267 and 344 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European


Intra-EU BITs, compatible with EU law? October 2017
  • HFW
  • Netherlands, Slovakia, Czech Republic, European Union
  • October 24 2017

In a somewhat surprising development but one that will be warmly welcomed by the international arbitration community, the Advocate General of the


European White Collar Crime Report - Q2 2017
  • Allen and Overy LLP
  • Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, United Kingdom, Belgium, Czech Republic, European Union, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy
  • July 13 2017

Across Europe, law makers are steadily expanding the circumstances in which companies can be found liable (whether criminally or otherwise) for the


BIT protections unaffected by EU law: Eastern Sugar BV v Czech Republic
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Netherlands, Czech Republic, European Union
  • January 8 2008

According to a tribunal constituted under the UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) Rules, protections enjoyed by foreign investors under the Czech-Netherlands Bilateral Investment Treaty are not superseded by the Czech Republic’s accession to the EU.


Daan Arends
  • DLA Piper

Raid Abu-Manneh
  • Mayer Brown


Sylvia Tonova
  • Jones Day

Mathieu Relange
  • Bird & Bird LLP