We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 49

Supreme Court rules receptionist negligent over misleading waiting time
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 10 2018

The Supreme Court today delivered a landmark unanimous judgment in the case of Michael Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust which will have


Vicarious Liability - Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 18 2017

Vicarious liability requires (1) the necessary relationship between the defendant and the wrongdoer, and (2) the necessary connection between that


Trust me I’m a Doctor
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 26 2017

The limitations of the Bolam principle and its application to cases involving consent were explored in the recent Court of Appeal decision of Webster


Professional advice can be taxing - don't sweat it
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 24 2017

When a professional provides negligent advice they may be liable for consequent loss. But is the professional liable for the distress caused by their


(Re)insurance Weekly Update 38- 2016
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 31 2016

The Court of Appeal's decision in this case was reported in Weekly Update 515. The insured solicitors had arranged funding for disbursements


Mis-selling of interest rate swaps: More cases coming through
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 26 2016

In this recent case, the court struck out a claim for negligence on limitation grounds. In spring 2008, the defendant bank had given advice to the


Proceedings stayed to allow FOS claim to proceed: Templars Estates Ltd & Ors v National Westminster Bank Plc & Anor (2016)
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 26 2016

The claimants had brought proceedings against the defendant banks for negligent advice. The claimants then applied to the Financial Ombudsman Service


Personal Injury - Further fundamental dishonesty guidance
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 17 2016

The Court of Appeal has confirmed a recent lower court ruling that failing to prove a case does not mean the claimant was dishonest and loses QOCS


PIFID&O - Report, reliance, refinance recovery
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 17 2016

In Tiuta International v De Villiers Chartered Surveyors the UK Court of Appeal considered the application of the "but for" causation test in a lender


Fraudulent Devices - Versloot Dredging BV & Anor v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG & Ors
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 5 2016

The Supreme Court has now handed down its decision in the final chapter of the long-running Versloot Dredging BV litigation. This decision is