We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 65

The impact of Brexit on the enforcement of judgments between the UK and EU Member States post-Brexit
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • March 28 2018

The impact of Brexit on the enforcement of judgments between the UK and EU member states is increasingly at the forefront of businesses' minds. This


Alternative dispute resolution
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • June 11 2015

Disputes in England are usually adjudicated after an adversarial process, either by a judge or by an arbitrator. Litigation is governed by


The Court of Appeal recalibrates Mitchell test to avoid future satellite litigation over procedural breaches
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom
  • July 31 2014

Despite Lord Justice Jackson's belief that his civil justice reforms would reduce satellite litigation, there have now been at least 100 court


A new meaning for debentures
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom
  • May 1 2014

In Fons HF v Corporal Limited and Others (2014), the Court of Appeal held that where there is a legal charge over shares, and the word "shares" is


Costs budgeting regime extended to most civil litigation
  • Hogan Lovells
  • USA
  • April 25 2014

One of the most innovative of the "Jackson reforms" was that courts would control the parties' costs before they arose, instead of assessing, at the


Supreme Court judgment widens the ambit of liability for negligent misrepresentation
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom
  • March 31 2014

In Cramaso LLP v Viscount Reidhaven's Trustees (2014), the Supreme Court considered a claim relating to a negligent misrepresentation made in


Court of Appeal decides that one bite of the cherry is enough for awards by the Financial Ombudsman Service
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom
  • March 31 2014

In Clark v In Focus Asset Management & Tax Solutions Ltd (2014), the Court of Appeal decided that an award by the Financial Ombudsman Service


Supreme Court finds that claims against dishonest assistants and knowing recipients in cases of fraudulent breach of trust are subject to a 6-year limitation period
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom
  • March 31 2014

Following a majority decision by the Supreme Court in Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria (2014), beneficiaries are no longer able to benefit from an


Damage limitation clauses: damages may not be an adequate remedy compared to injunctive relief
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom
  • March 31 2014

The Court of Appeal has ruled that damage limitation clauses in a contract do not automatically prevent an interim injunction application from being


The courts see-saw over implementing Jackson reforms
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom
  • March 31 2014

In our newsflash of 27 November 2013, we reported on the ground-breaking case of Mitchell v News Group Newspapers, where the Court of Appeal made