We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,134

S.D. Fla. Excludes evidence of pre-litigation negotiations and allows evidence of prior litigations and hypothetical negotiations
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • March 21 2018

The Southern District of Florida, Judge Kevin Michael Moore presiding, in Prisua Engineering Corp v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Civil Action


EDVA refuses to strike evidence of prior negotiations and cross-licensing
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • February 21 2018

The Eastern District of Virginia, Judge Leonie Brinkema presiding, in Amdocs (Israel) Limited v. Openet Telecom, Inc., Civil Action 1:10-cv-910


DDel holds that determining the royalty base is a relevance issue, not Daubert
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • February 16 2018

The District of Delaware, Judge Richard G. Andrews presiding, in D&M Holdings, Inc. v. Sonos, Inc., Civil Action 16-141-RGA (D. Del. Feb. 6, 2018


The Law May Have Changed, But In Texas You’ll Remain
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • February 15 2018

The Supreme Court's TC Heartland decision in May set off a tidal wave that completely reshaped the contours of patent venue law.1 Riding its wake


CAFC grants new trial - Royalty base can be total sales, but the royalty rate must be properly apportioned
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • February 15 2018

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in Exmark Manuf. Co. Inc. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Prods. Grp, LLC, 879 F.3d 1332 (Fed


Damages opinion related to FRAND excluded due to lack of supporting evidence
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • February 14 2018

The Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell presiding, in Network-1 Techs., Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc


DMass requires production of communication with licensees
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • February 14 2018

The District of Massachusetts, Judge Casper presiding, in Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Wangs Alliance Corp., Civil Action 14-12298-DJC (D. Mass. Jan. 2


Massachusetts Patent Litigation Wrap Up - December 2017
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • January 24 2018

This post is part of a monthly series summarizing notable activity in patent litigation in the District of Massachusetts, including short summaries of


"Cry Havoc and Let Slip the Dogs of War"
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • January 16 2018

A recently filed lawsuit in Washington State provides some useful takeaways in the realm of brand protection for educational institutions. Gonzaga


Wifi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp: Petitions for inter partes review are time-barred are reviewable on appeal
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • January 10 2018

On January 8, 2018, the Federal Circuit sitting en banc issued its decision in Wifi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp., No. 2015-1944, holding that PTAB