We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,364

IP Audit - the Fifth Circuit cuts a big hole in the IP safety net - time to see if your business can still be protected?
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • November 20 2017

It is time for an IP audit for any company doing business in Texas following the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision last week in Motion


Calling all ISPs: Your DMCA Agent Must Be (Re)Designated By December 31, 2017
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • November 15 2017

The Copyright Office has announced a change that requires all internet service providers to re-designate their DMCA agent by December 31, 2017. The


Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on Probative Value of “Patent Dance” Letters and aBLA Parameters in an Infringement Analysis
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • November 15 2017

On November 13th, in an opinion drafted by Judge Taranto, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Southern District Court of Florida's judgment that Apotex's


Impression Products v. Lexmark: How can sellers protect themselves after their patent rights are exhausted? Two examples and one warning
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • November 14 2017

I was on a panel at the Patent Law in Global Perspectives Seminar on October 20 at Stanford Law School, discussing the implications of Impression


Minnesota Patent Litigation Wrap-Up - October 2017
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • November 7 2017

This post continues our monthly summary of patent litigation in the District of Minnesota, including short summaries of substantive orders issued in


Distillations: Glass Half Full
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • October 18 2017

Here at the Distillations Desk we've talked about trademark disputes over the shapes of bottles, but now comes a case about the shapes of glasses. On


D Minn addresses inexorable flow, non-infringing alternatives, EMVR, apportionment
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • October 18 2017

The District of Minnesota, Judge Ericksen presiding, in Select Comfort Corp. v. Tempur Sealy Int’l, Inc., Civil Action 14-cv-245 JNETNL (D. Minn


CAFC denies rehearing en banc in Mentor Graphics lost profits case
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • October 18 2017

The Federal Circuit, in Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc. (also including Synopsys, Inc. as a defendant), Nos. 2015-1470, 2015-1554, 2015-1556


EDTX excludes evidence party’s actual behavior at hypothetical negotiation
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • October 18 2017

The Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, in Evicam Int’l, Inc. v. Enforcement Video, LLC dba Watchguard Video, Civil Action 4:16-CV-105


Massachusetts Patent Litigation Wrap Up - September 2017
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • October 11 2017

This post is part of a monthly series summarizing notable activity in patent litigation in the District of Massachusetts, including short summaries of