We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

1 results found

Article

Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | USA | 7 Jul 2011

Talking dirty: Court of Appeal rejects harassment claim based on vulgar speech

In the recent decision Kelley v. The Conco Companies, a California Court of Appeal held that a supervisor's graphic and demeaning sexual comments did not support a claim for same-sex harassment because they were not based on, or made "because of," the plaintiff employee's sex.

Previous page 1 Next page