We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 99

Asos to pay over £20 million to settle trade mark litigation
  • Gowling WLG
  • United Kingdom
  • October 19 2016

Online fashion and beauty retailer Asos, previously known as As Seen On Screen, is paying over £20 million to cycle wear manufacturer Assos of


Apotex loses the war in Canada and the battle in England: UK courts rely on Canadian decision to find Apotex acting unlawfully in cCnada has consequences in eErope
  • Gowling WLG
  • United Kingdom, Canada
  • October 13 2011

Servier developed perindopril erbumine (“perindopril”) which is a successful long lasting ACE inhibitor sold under the trade-mark COVERSYL.


Liability where cause of a product defect is unclear
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • October 4 2011

In the recent decision of Muskoka Fuels v. Hassan Steel Fabricators Ltd., the Ontario Court of Appeal addressed the issue of liability, under the provincial Sale of Goods Act where a product had failed but no party (or expert) could explain why.


Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Hospira Healthcare Ccorporation - interlocutory order, motion to amend statement of claim (gemcitabine)
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • June 28 2011

This is an appeal of an Order whereby Madam Prothonotary Tabib allowed Lilly to amend its Statement of Claim after the Statement of Defence had been served but prior to examinations for discovery.


B.C. appeal decisions could mark the end of indirect purchaser class actions
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • June 8 2011

This spring, the B.C Court of Appeal released two decisions that could mark the end of indirect purchaser class actions in Canada.


Supreme Court rules on enforceability of consumer arbitration clauses
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • March 31 2011

The March 18, 2011 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Seidel v. Telus Communications Inc. clarifies the state of the law regarding arbitration clauses in “contracts of adhesion”.


Continuing duty to warn after product recall
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • March 31 2011

The recent case of Hutton v. General Motors of Canada Limited discusses the legal duties, including the continuing duty to warn, that remain after a manufacturer's product recall.


Apotex Inc. v. H. Lundbeck AS (2011 FC 88), citalopram, T-575-04, January 26, 2011
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • March 15 2011

In an action for patent infringement and under s. 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations regarding citalopram, Prothonotary Tabib granted Lundeck’s request for letters rogatory with respect of Matrix Laboratories Ltd.


Hospira v Eli Lilly, appeal of order for further and better production of documents, gemcitabine, October 26, 2010
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • November 24 2010

Eli Lilly alleged that gemcitabine made in China and imported into Canada by Hospira infringes Eli Lilly's patent for an intermediate process step in the manufacture of gemcitabine.


Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc (2010 FCA 240)
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • October 27 2010

This was an appeal of the decision of Madame Justice Gauthier (in the Federal Court) who had found that although Lilly met its burden to prove that Apotex infringed eight Lilly process patents related to the manufacture of the antibiotic cefaclor for material imported before June 3, 1998, Lilly failed to do so for the cefaclor imported into Canada after June 3, 1998.