We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Clear all

Refine your search

Content type

Tags

Author

3 results found

Article

Fox Rothschild LLP | USA | 25 Jun 2011

Judge Robinson finds that Neutrogena's challenged advertisements were literally false but denies Schering-Plough's motion for permanent injunction

By Memorandum Order entered by the Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. Neutrogena Corporation, Civil Action No. 09-642-SLR (D.Del., June 8, 2011), the Court denied the motion for permanent injunction of plaintiff Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. (“Schering-Plough”) seeking to enjoin defendant Neutrogena Corporation (“Neutrogena”) from all future use of the helioplex mark in DEHN-free products. Id. at 8.

Previous page 1 Next page