We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 35

Supreme Court Watch: Mission Product v. Tempnology
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • October 30 2018

On Friday, October 26, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in what could be a landmark decision concerning trademark issues in bankruptcy


Media Coverage - Wayfair Decision
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2018

On June 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the physical presence standard determined in Quill is "unsound and incorrect." In overturning that


The New Administration’s Deregulatory Agenda and its Impact on Environmental & Energy Policy
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • July 28 2017

As seen in the first six months of President Trump's Administration, the country is on a rollercoaster ride. There is much uncertainty regarding the


California Resale Royalty Act Claims Dismissed as Preempted by Copyright Law, Despite 1980 Ninth Circuit Holding to the Contrary
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • April 13 2016

Just three months after the Supreme Court denied certiorari review of last year's Ninth Circuit decision finding California's Resale Royalty Act


Supreme Court grants preclusive effect to Trademark Trial and Appeal Board rulings in limited circumstances
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2015

Today the Supreme Court announced its decision in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. B&B Hardware (B&B) sells a fastener product in the


Supreme Court declines to hear Norton Simon intermediate appeal, Von Saher claim returns to trial court
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • January 21 2015

The Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena’s efforts to bring an end to the claim by Marei von Saher to Lucas Cranach the Elder’s Adam and Eve failed


The Supreme Court’s decision to overturn DOMA: what it means for employers
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • June 28 2013

Now that the United States Supreme Court has announced that Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional, a host of


U.S. Supreme Court rules in cross-border water rights dispute; Oklahoma scores a clean sweep in “Red River rivalry” with Texas
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • June 24 2013

On June 13, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued a 9-0 decision in Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann, a dispute involving whether


Supreme Court accepts case regarding the reach of Monsanto’s intellectual property rights to second generation seeds
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • January 7 2013

On Friday, October 5, 2012, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision in Monsanto Co. v


Expanding jurisdiction and contracting claims: the Supreme Court declines to review the Cassirer and Von Saher cases
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2011

A pair of denials by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 27, 2011 for review of two art restitution cases renews the importance of earlier rulings by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (1) applying the reach of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (the “FSIA”) to a foreign sovereign other than the one who unlawfully took works of art, and (2) confirming the defeat of California’s legislative efforts to extend the statute of limitations for wartime art restitution claims.