We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 15

Supreme Court upholds passive euthanasia, issues guidelines on advance directives in landmark judgement
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • March 14 2018

A Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, comprising of the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Mr Justice A M Khanwilkar


Supreme Court holds ruling on limitation is interim award and subject to challenge under section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • February 23 2018

A Division bench of the Supreme Court of India (Court) consisting of the Hon'ble Justices R F Nariman and Navin Sinha recently held that a ruling on


Supreme Court rules that section 50 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, can’t be bypassed through recourse to section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • February 23 2018

A Division Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court), on 7 February 2018, in the matter of Kandla Export Corporation and Another vs


Supreme Court clarifies the appropriate jurisdiction for enforcement of an arbitral award
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • February 16 2018

By a judgment delivered on 15 February 2018 in Sundaram Finance v Abdul Samad & Anr (Civil Appeal No 1650 of 2018), a two Judge bench of the Hon'ble


Delhi High Court upholds foreign award in favour of daiichi (except qua minor respondents)
  • Khaitan & Co
  • Singapore, India
  • February 6 2018

By a judgment delivered on 31 January 2018, the Delhi High Court has held that the award passed in favour of Daiichi Sankyo Company Ltd. (the


Supreme Court says no to arbitration in landlord-tenancy disputes
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • January 29 2018

A Supreme Court (Court) bench consisting of the Hon'ble Justices R K Agarwal and Abhay Manohar Sapre recently reaffirmed the non-arbitrability of


Supreme Court declares section 45(1) of prevention of money laundering act, 2002 as unconstitutional
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • January 3 2018

The Division Bench of the Supreme Court of India (SC), comprising Justice R F Nariman and Justice S K Kaul, has declared Section 45(1) of the


SC: Arbitrator cannot award pendente lite interest when specific provision in contract bars payment of interest
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • October 10 2017

On 03 October 2017, the Supreme Court of India in the matter of Chittaranjan Maity v Union of India has reaffirmed the position that under the


SC: Employee of a party allowed as ‘arbitrator’ in proceedings initiated prior to 2015 amendment to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • September 21 2017

On 12 September 2017, the Supreme Court of India, in the matter of Aravali Power Company Private Limited Vs. Ms Era Infra Engineering Limited


Delhi High Court strikes down NDMC (determination of annual rent) bye-laws, 2009 as being ultra vires the NDMC Act 1994
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • August 22 2017

The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court (Delhi HC), in its Judgment dated 10 August 2017 (Judgment) has struck down the New Delhi Municipal Council