We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-7 of 7

Full bench Bombay High Court holds infringement claims based on trademarks used as part of corporate name will be governed only by Section 29 (5) of TM Act
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • March 3 2017

On 1 March 2017, the Full Bench of Bombay High Court (High Court), in the matter of Cipla Limited (CIPLA) v Cipla Industries Private Limited


Cabinet approves India’s first national IPR policy
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • May 17 2016

On 13 May 2016, the Union Cabinet approved India’s first Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) policy for awareness, creation, commercialization


Possible to decide copyright infringement claims in arbitration, states High Court of Bombay
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • April 25 2016

In Eros International Media Limited v Telemax Links India Pvt Ltd (Notice of Motion No 886 of 2013 of Suit No 331 of 2013), a Single Judge of the


Delhi High Court dismisses Ericsson’s plea challenging CCI orders
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • April 4 2016

In a petition filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson) challenging two orders of the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the Delhi High


Lee pharma’s compulsory license application for saxagliptin rejected by Indian Patent Office
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • January 22 2016

In an order dated 19 January 2016 (Order), the Controller General of Patents and Trademarks (CGPTM) rejected the application for Compulsory License


Nishad Nadkarni
  • Khaitan & Co