We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,491

Additional Guidance Available Regarding Selection of “Qualified Opportunity Zones” Ahead of Imminent Deadline
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 19 2018

As part of federal tax reform, Congress created a new program to encourage investment in businesses that are located in low-income communities that


IPR Institution Decisions are not (Entirely) Immune from Appeal
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 13 2018

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently opened the door to reviewing one aspect of decisions to institute Inter Partes Review (IPR


Spending Bill Dramatically Increases Penalties for Health Care Fraud and Abuse
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 9 2018

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (the act), signed into law by President Trump on February 9, 2018 includes provisions that more than double the


New Federal Qualified Opportunity Zone Program
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 8 2018

As part of federal tax reform, Congress created a new “Qualified Opportunity Zone” program to encourage investment in businesses that are located in


Can Post-Filing Evidence be used to Invalidate a Patent?
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2018

This past October, in Amgen v. Sanofi (Fed. Cir. 2017), the Federal Circuit sent shivers down the spine of the biotechnology industry when it


New York’s Highest Court Rules that Pre-Certification Settlements Require Class Notice
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2018

The New York Court of Appeals (the state’s highest court) recently issued a potentially game-changing decision on pre-certification settlements in


City of Columbus Tax Incentives Are No Longer Available If You File Your Columbus Net Profits Tax Return with the Ohio Department of Taxation
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2018

Columbus has implemented a new policy prohibiting businesses from benefiting from incentives granted and administered by Columbus for any year in


U.S. EPA Finalizes Rule Delaying WOTUS Applicability Date
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 2 2018

This post provides an important update to our January 22, 2018 entry. On January 31, 2018, U.S. EPA and the Army Corp finalized a rule that makes the


Labor and Employment Alert: California Law Regulates Employers’ Responses to Federal Immigration Inspections
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2018

With immigration being a hot topic, California employers should be aware of legislation enacted in October 2017 that restricts their ability to


Cut & Paste
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2018

Given "clear evidence of the potential for harm," a leading physician in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Patient Safety Network