We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 11

Breach of loyalty in run-up to a going private transaction costs President and controlling shareholder nearly $150 million
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • USA
  • December 4 2015

In In re Dole Food Co., Inc. Stockholder Litigation, the Delaware Court of Chancery awarded $148,190,590 in damages against Dole's controlling


Delaware Supreme Court revisits Revlon duties, clarifies meaning of “market check”
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2015

In C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. City of Miami General Employees' and Sanitation Employees' Retirement Trust, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a


Related party transactions: a cautionary note from the Delaware Court of Chancery
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2015

A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision in In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. discusses the process surrounding related party transactions in


Survival clauses and limitations law in Delaware and Ontario: a quick comparison
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • USA, Canada
  • May 14 2014

In the past few years, two Delaware Court of Chancery decisions - GRT, Inc. v. Marathon GTF Technology, Ltd. and ENI Holdings, LLC v. KBR Group


Earn-out providing for return of assets if targets not met, rather than expressly requiring purchaser "effort", will not be rewritten just because the weak economy and other factors have made an asset return unpalatable to the seller
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • USA
  • April 6 2010

This ruling by Vice Chancellor Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery reminds us that in a commercial relationship, the contract reigns supreme.


Delaware court won't stop shareholder meeting to approve merger from going ahead, holding that disclosure issues cited were not material
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • USA
  • October 22 2008

Unless unhappy shareholders make a really strong case, Delaware courts appear reluctant to issue injunctive relief against proposed transactions in a weak M&A market.


Simon Romano
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP


Stéphane Rousseau
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP

Benoît C. Dubord
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP