We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 91

Class Dismissed! Federal Court of Appeal Rejects Class-Based Public Interest Privilege
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • February 9 2018

The Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) recently ruled that records provided by third parties to the Competition Bureau (“Bureau”) used in investigations


Appel rejeté! La Cour d'appel fédérale rejette le privilège générique fondé sur l'intérêt public
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • February 9 2018

La Cour d'appel fédérale (CAF) a récemment statué que les dossiers fournis par des tiers au Bureau de la concurrence (le Bureau ) dans le cadre


Les 10 principales évolutions de la législation relative à la protection de la vie privée
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • December 19 2017

Vous devez faire du rattrapage en ce qui concerne l’évolution de la législation relative à la protection de la vie privée en 2017? Voici la liste des


GSTHST on timeshare club annual fee: Tax Court ruling reversed on appeal
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 25 2017

On July 11, 2017, in its much-anticipated decision in Club Intrawest v. The Queen, the Federal Court of Appeal ("FCA") set aside a judgment of the


In an important customs case, the Federal Court of Appeal rules that government agencies must follow the decisions of the tribunals that regulate them
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • November 16 2016

On October 21, 2016 the Federal Court of Appeal (the "FCA") ruled on the ability of importers to correct the tariff treatment declared upon


Customs tariff classification of hockey gear goes to ultimate referee: the Supreme Court of Canada
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • October 11 2016

On September 29, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") issued a significant judgment on customs tariff classification. As noted in the majority


Supreme Court restores norm: no termination without cause under Canada Labour Code
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 21 2016

On July 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision in Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, where the 6-3 majority concluded


Interlocutory injunction in trade-mark infringement action upheld by Federal Court of Appeal
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • July 15 2015

On April 23, 2015, in Jamieson Laboratories Ltd. v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC and Reckitt Benckiser (Canada) Limited 2015 FCA 104, the Federal Court


Federal Court of Appeal confirms that R&D costs paid by a Canadian subsidiary to its U.S. Parent are dutiable for Canadian customs purposes
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 2 2015

On March 2, 2015, the Federal Court of Appeal (the "FCA"), in the decision Skechers USA Canada Inc. v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency


Cracking the Code: Federal Court of Appeal confirms employers can dismiss employees without cause under the Canada Labour Code
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • February 11 2015

For a number of years, there has been differing viewpoints on whether Part III of the Canada Labour Code (the Code) permits dismissals on a without