We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 13

Le Canada encourage la bonne citoyenneté des entreprises grâce à un nouveau programme d’accord de réparation et à un programme d’intégrité élargi
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 26 2018

Un projet de modification législative faisant suite à la consultation publique menée par le gouvernement du Canada en 2017 sur l’amélioration possible


Canada Promotes Good Corporate Citizenship With New Remediation Agreement Program and Enhanced Integrity Regime
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 26 2018

Proposed legislative changes that follow from the Government of Canada’s 2017 public consultation on improving the Integrity Regime (discussed in a


Government of Canada Reports on Public Consultations about the Integrity Regime and Deferred Prosecution Agreements
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • February 24 2018

The Government of Canada has expressed an ongoing commitment to taking action against corporate wrongdoing, including improper, unethical and illegal


Le gouvernement du Canada fait le point sur sa consultation publique sur le Régime d’intégrité et les accords de poursuite suspendue
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • February 24 2018

Le Gouvernement du Canada maintient son engagement à prendre des mesures contre les actes répréhensibles des entreprises, y compris les pratiques


British Columbia Court of Appeal overturns certification of pharmaceutical class action
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • February 20 2015

In a decision released January 22, 2015, the B.C. Court of Appeal unanimously overturned an order certifying a class proceeding against the


Supreme Court of Canada allows indirect purchasers of products to sue for damages
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • October 31 2013

The Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited rulings on October 31 in proposed class actions involving claims for damages for alleged competition law


Court of Appeal for British Columbia bars indirect purchaser suits
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 19 2011

On April 15, 2011, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia released judgments in two competition class actions which concluded for the first time in Canada that indirect purchasers of allegedly price-fixed products "have no cause of action recognized in law.


Canadian Competition Tribunal to review real estate rules
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 21 2010

In February 2010, the Commissioner of Competition commenced an application against The Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) alleging that CREA violated the abuse of dominance provisions of the Competition Act.


Certification of competition class actions: the tide turns against defendants
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • April 21 2010

Until recently, Canadian courts were generally reluctant to certify class actions alleging violations of competition law, principally on the basis that plaintiffs failed to put forward a workable class-wide method for determining the existence of harm for each class member.


Proof of loss by proof of gain: B.C. Court of Appeal reversal certifies DRAM price-fixing class action
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • November 19 2009

On November 12, 2009, the British Columbia Court of Appeal unanimously allowed an appeal from the dismissal of a class certification motion in an action alleging price-fixing against certain manufacturers of DRAM (dynamic random access memory) chips, which are found in a wide variety of electronics products.