We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 32

First federal appellate court holds a noncash reverse payment subject to antitrust scrutiny: is the Third Circuit's decision in King Drug a turning point?
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • July 9 2015

Recently, the Third Circuit issued the first federal appellate decision interpreting the Supreme Court's landmark decision in FTC v. Actavis, Inc


Third Circuit creates reverse payments split among the circuits
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • July 25 2012

Rejecting the test established by three separate courts of appeal, the Third Circuit's recent decision in In re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation has created a circuit split regarding the legality of, and application of antitrust law to, "pay-for-delay" settlements to patent lawsuits.


An overseas sea change for U.S. antitrust laws? New developments in the interpretation of the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • September 7 2011

Did it just get easier for plaintiffs to apply U.S. antitrust laws to foreign conduct?


Third Circuit adopts deferential approach to determine whether sports sanctioning bodies' exclusive equipment requirements and contracts violate antitrust laws
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2010

On July 23, 2010, the Third Circuit held that a racing circuit's decisions to adopt an exclusive equipment requirement and enter into a corresponding exclusive supply contract with the equipment manufacturer do not violate the antitrust laws.


Rachel S Fischer
  • Proskauer Rose LLP

Daniel Werb
  • Proskauer Rose LLP

David A. Munkittrick
  • Proskauer Rose LLP

Daryn A Grossman
  • Proskauer Rose LLP

Colin Kass
  • Proskauer Rose LLP

Ronald Meisburg
  • Proskauer Rose LLP