We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-5 of 5

The First Circuit Agrees that Non-Cash Reverse Payments Are Subject to Antitrust Scrutiny. Does the Loestrin Decision Point to Battles to Come?
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • March 8 2016

Recently, the First Circuit became the second federal appellate court interpreting the Supreme Court's landmark decision in FTC v. Actavis, Inc. to


First federal appellate court holds a noncash reverse payment subject to antitrust scrutiny: is the Third Circuit's decision in King Drug a turning point?
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • July 9 2015

Recently, the Third Circuit issued the first federal appellate decision interpreting the Supreme Court's landmark decision in FTC v. Actavis, Inc


Supreme Court holds reverse payment settlements are subject to rule-of-reason scrutiny in landmark ruling
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • June 21 2013

In Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., the Supreme Court, in a 5-3 decision written by Justice Breyer, reversed the Eleventh Circuit's



Andrew S Wellin
  • Proskauer Rose LLP