We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-3 of 3

Third Circuit adopts deferential approach to determine whether sports sanctioning bodies' exclusive equipment requirements and contracts violate antitrust laws
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2010

On July 23, 2010, the Third Circuit held that a racing circuit's decisions to adopt an exclusive equipment requirement and enter into a corresponding exclusive supply contract with the equipment manufacturer do not violate the antitrust laws.



Robert D. Forbes
  • Proskauer Rose LLP