We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 17

eDiscovery Includes Electronic Vehicle Data and Possible Sanctions for Spoliation
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • October 19 2017

Discovery of relevant material extends far beyond documents created on personal computers. Discoverable data exists in many forms, including


Case Halted: California Court Denies Class Certification in Ford Defective Steering Case
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 18 2017

On December 22, 2016, a federal District Court Judge in the Northern District of California denied certification of three proposed classes of


Baby You Can Drive My Car
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 26 2016

Consumers can expect many benefits from their cars’ increased data collection programs, running the gamut from simple location services like GPS and


Derailing an expert in the Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation: what every litigator needs to know
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • November 12 2014

The business of buying, selling, investing in, and arbitraging legal claims continues to grow, and carries with it hidden pitfalls. This is


Unfair competition claim against trucking company is not preempted by federal law
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • September 8 2014

The People on behalf of the State of California filed this unfair competition law (“UCL”) action against Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc., for


U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rule that GPS installation and tracking of a vehicle constitutes a search, but the justices disagree on rationale - are lines being drawn on privacy rights and new technology?
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 23 2012

In a narrowly-drawn majority opinion, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Antoine Jones that the Government’s attachment of a GPS-tracking device to a vehicle, and the subsequent monitoring of the movements of that vehicle on public streets, constitutes a search.


There's no sense waiting to see what the U.S. Supreme Court has to say about GPS tracking
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 5 2012

That appears to be the opinion of Magistrate Judge David Noce in United States v. Robinson, No. 4:11-cr-00361 (D. Mo. Dec. 27, 2011), who ruled that GPS tracking of a public official suspected of having a no-show municipal job did not require a warrant.


Tony Oncidi
  • Proskauer Rose LLP

Colin Kass
  • Proskauer Rose LLP