We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-4 of 4

Claims for benefits
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 16 2012

In Schultz v. Aviall, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan, 670 F.3d 834 (7th Cir. 2012), the Seventh Circuit held that the plan admistrator of a disability plan acted properly by interpreting a Social Security offset provision that limited benefits by accounting for Social Security benefits paid to the participants and their dependent children.

Daryn A Grossman
  • Proskauer Rose LLP

Neil Shah
  • Proskauer Rose LLP