We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 95

Illegal or Fraudulent Entry Into the U.S. and its Effect on Asylum
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • December 19 2017

Those seeking to escape immediate danger or imminent persecution often rely on false documents when fleeing to a safe country. But can a fraudulent or


War of the World Wide Webs: D.C. Circuit Refuses Terror Victims’ Attempt to Seize Internet Domain Names
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA, Global
  • August 25 2016

In early August, the D.C. Circuit refused to allow victims of terror attacks to take control of the Internet domain names of Iran, North Korea, and


Microsoft ordered to hand over data to the U.S. government
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2014

In April, Microsoft tried to quash a search warrant from law enforcement agents in the United States (U.S.) that asked the technology company to


Federal District Court holds that OFCCP has jurisdiction over hospitals that provide services to HMOs retained by federal government
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 4 2013

Earlier this week, the federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that three hospitals providing medical services through an HMO to U


Supreme Court upholds the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate: what it means for employers and plan sponsors
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • June 28 2012

The Supreme Court of the United States (the "Court") ruled today, in a 5-to-4 landmark decision, that the individual mandate under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("the Act") is constitutional, although it also held that certain Medicaid expansion provisions are unconstitutional.


The constitutionality of the individual mandate under the Affordable Care Act an issue now ripe for Supreme Court review
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • November 7 2011

Section 1501 of the Affordable Care Act requires all individuals (with limited exception) to buy health insurance or pay a penalty to the federal government, starting in 2014.


Employees may have committed a crime by violating employer’s computer use policy
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • May 11 2011

In this criminal proceeding brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), the United States government filed a 20-count indictment against David Nosal (a former employee of KornFerry International) and his accomplices (also from KornFerry) as a result of their obtaining information from their employer’s computer system for the purpose of defrauding KornFerry and helping Nosal set up a competing business.


NASA employees’ privacy was not invaded by background check
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • March 18 2011

Twenty-eight contract employees of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (“JPL”), which is owned by NASA but operated by Cal Tech, had never been subjected to a government background investigation.


Please ignore the intrusion, we just have a few questions to ask: Supreme Court validates background checks for government contractors
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 26 2011

On January 19, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal government has broad latitude to conduct background checks on contractors who work at government facilities.


U.S. government sues estate and donees of J. Howard Marshall II for unpaid gift taxes
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • November 5 2010

The U.S. government is suing the estate and donees of J. Howard Marshall for a combined $85 million of unpaid gift and GST taxes.