We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 24

Anti-Reliance Provision Will Be Effective (and Bar Fraud Claims Based on Extra-Contractual Statements) Only If Drafted as a Disclaimer by the Buyer FDG Logistics
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • USA
  • February 29 2016

In FdG Logistics v. A&R Logistics (Feb. 23, 2016), the Delaware Court of Chancery held that an antireliance provision in a merger agreement is not


Jennifer L. Rodburg
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP

Gary L. Kaplan
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP

Matthew V. Soran
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP

Peter L. Simmons
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP

David B. Hennes
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP

Brad Eric Scheler
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP

David L. Shaw
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP

Jean E. Hanson
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP