We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 18

DOJ Complaint Names Private Equity Firm as Defendant in False Claims Act Case Targeting Health Care Portfolio Company
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • March 23 2018

The U.S. Department of Justice’s recent decision to name a private equity firm as a defendant in a False Claims Act complaint against one of the


Brave New World: Compliance and the Transition to Value-Based Care
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2017

The U.S. health care system is in the midst of a fundamental shift, away from traditional “fee-for-service” models that reward providers for the


Don't WannaCry: Ten Questions Boards and Company Management Can Ask in the Wake of Recent Ransomware Attacks
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Global
  • May 19 2017

The WannaCry ransomware attack that hit computers around the world last week is yet another reminder that computers play key roles in most enterprises


Ten Things Investors Need to Know About Value-Based Healthcare
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2017

Value-based healthcare ("VBH") arrangements are an alternative to traditional volume-based reimbursement methodologies. VBH payment models


Recommendations for Medical Device Manufacturers
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • April 27 2017

The U.S. health care system is in the midst of a fundamental shift, away from traditional fee-for-service models that reward providers based upon the


What’s Ahead for Value-Based Health Care?
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • February 22 2017

Prior to the presidential election in November, experts believed that the trend toward value-based payment - the concept of rewarding providers based


California Attorney General issues guidance on do not track
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2014

In 2013, the California Legislature passed a tracking transparency bill, AB 370, which amended the California Online Privacy Protection Act


Hulu Video Privacy Protection Act summary judgment ruling in the N.D. Of California emphasizes importance of knowing what data companies are collecting and sharing when consumers watch video online
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • May 2 2014

On Monday, April 28, 2014, the Northern District of California in In Re: Hulu Privacy Litigation, No. 3:11-cv-03764-LB (M.J. Laurel Beeler), issued a


No more excuses: HHS issues new HIPAA tool for small businesses
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • April 9 2014

Three U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") agencies, the Office for the National Coordinator for Health IT ("ONC"), in conjunction


Ninth Circuit rules against Spokeo on FCRA claim
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • February 13 2014

On February 4, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that plaintiffs need not allege actual injury to demonstrate constitutional