AND	term1 AND term2	Both terms must be included
OR	term1 OR term2	Either term
NOT	term1 NOT term2	term2 must not appear
""	"term1 term2"	Exact match
()	term1 AND (term2 OR term3)	Grouping terms
?	withdr?w	Single letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrew)
*	withdr*	Multiple letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrawn, withdrawing)
"..."~n	"term1 term2"~n	Proximity (term1 within n words of term2)

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Jurisdiction

Work area

Firm name

Date from

Date to

Results:1-10 of 2,640

United Technologies Hit with $13.9 Million Fine for Making Illicit Payments

Ropes & Gray LLP
USA
September 19 2018

On September 12, 2018, the United Technologies Corporation ("UTC") reached a $13.9 million resolution with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

PTAB Debates Standard for Reasonable Number of Substitute Claims

Ropes & Gray LLP
USA
September 18 2018

Given the complications associated with amending litigated claims, amendment is still relatively rare at the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB). Yet

CAFC Explains PTAB Burden Shift for Claimed Ranges

Ropes & Gray LLP
USA
September 17 2018

Since the Federal Circuit's decision in Magnum Oil, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) has been mindful that the ultimate burden of persuasion

PTAB Expands Equitable Considerations to Deny AIA Trial Petitions

Ropes & Gray LLP
USA
September 13 2018

As I have mentioned on a few CLE panels as of late, the recent changes to the Patent Trial & Appeal Board's (PTAB) Trial Practice Guide invite

New York Supreme Court enjoins Xerox acquisition

Ropes & Gray LLP
USA
September 12 2018

The Commercial Division of the New York Supreme Court recently enjoined Fujifilm Holdings Corp's proposed acquisition of a controlling interest in

Burden Clarification To Expand PTAB Discovery for RPIPrivity Disputes?

Ropes & Gray LLP
USA
September 11 2018

On the heels of Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corporation, the Federal Circuit once again finds itself considering a PTAB RPIPrivity

Failure to Pursue SAS Grounds Leads to Statutory Estoppel

Ropes & Gray LLP
USA
September 6 2018

IPR estoppel is established under 35 U.S.C. 315(e)(2), which provides that “the petitioner in an inter partes review of a claim in a patent

Bid Rigging: For Multinationals, More Than Just a Local Law Violation

Ropes & Gray LLP
Global
September 5 2018

In many countries, purchases of products or services by government or public entities take place primarily through public tenders. The theory

Common sense prevails in the UK’s battle over Legal Professional Privilege

Ropes & Gray LLP
United Kingdom
September 5 2018

Companies around the world can finally breathe a sigh of relief today with respect to the UK's position on privilege in criminal investigations. In a

An overview of patentability in China

Ropes & Gray LLP
China, Global
September 3 2018

An invention or utility model must meet the following requirements to be patentable (Article 22 of the Patent Law): Novelty - the invention or utility

Search techniques

Current Search

Refine

Content type

Tags