We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 2,640

United Technologies Hit with $13.9 Million Fine for Making Illicit Payments
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • September 19 2018

On September 12, 2018, the United Technologies Corporation ("UTC") reached a $13.9 million resolution with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


PTAB Debates Standard for Reasonable Number of Substitute Claims
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • September 18 2018

Given the complications associated with amending litigated claims, amendment is still relatively rare at the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB). Yet


CAFC Explains PTAB Burden Shift for Claimed Ranges
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • September 17 2018

Since the Federal Circuit's decision in Magnum Oil, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) has been mindful that the ultimate burden of persuasion


PTAB Expands Equitable Considerations to Deny AIA Trial Petitions
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • September 13 2018

As I have mentioned on a few CLE panels as of late, the recent changes to the Patent Trial & Appeal Board's (PTAB) Trial Practice Guide invite


New York Supreme Court enjoins Xerox acquisition
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • September 12 2018

The Commercial Division of the New York Supreme Court recently enjoined Fujifilm Holdings Corp's proposed acquisition of a controlling interest in


Burden Clarification To Expand PTAB Discovery for RPIPrivity Disputes?
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • September 11 2018

On the heels of Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corporation, the Federal Circuit once again finds itself considering a PTAB RPIPrivity


Failure to Pursue SAS Grounds Leads to Statutory Estoppel
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • September 6 2018

IPR estoppel is established under 35 U.S.C. 315(e)(2), which provides that “the petitioner in an inter partes review of a claim in a patent


Bid Rigging: For Multinationals, More Than Just a Local Law Violation
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Global
  • September 5 2018

In many countries, purchases of products or services by government or public entities take place primarily through public tenders. The theory


Common sense prevails in the UK’s battle over Legal Professional Privilege
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 5 2018

Companies around the world can finally breathe a sigh of relief today with respect to the UK's position on privilege in criminal investigations. In a


An overview of patentability in China
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • China, Global
  • September 3 2018

An invention or utility model must meet the following requirements to be patentable (Article 22 of the Patent Law): Novelty - the invention or utility