We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 194

Uttam Galva Steels Limited v Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd
  • 20 Essex Street
  • United Kingdom
  • May 25 2018

In Uttam Galva Steels Limited v Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd, Mr Justice Picken considered an application under s. 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 against


Whether arbitration agreement in underlying contract extends to claims under bills of exchange
  • 20 Essex Street
  • United Kingdom
  • May 25 2018

In Uttam Galva Steels Limited v Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd, Mr Justice Picken considered an application under s. 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 against


In a bind? Supreme Court sets out radical new position on the law of contractual variation
  • 20 Essex Street
  • United Kingdom
  • May 23 2018

In Lord Sumption’s words, the appeal resolved by the Supreme Court last week was “exceptional” and raised “truly fundamental issues in the law of


Arbitral appointments: broadening horizons or getting into deep water?
  • 20 Essex Street
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • May 18 2018

The recent decision in Halliburton v Chubb is of great interest for its treatment of an application to remove an arbitrator under s 24 of the


Arbitral appointments: broadening horizons or getting into deep water?
  • 20 Essex Street
  • United Kingdom
  • May 15 2018

The recent decision in Halliburton v Chubb is of great interest for its treatment of an application to remove an arbitrator under s 24 of the


EU Justice Sub-Committee follow-up inquiry into civil justice cooperation post Brexit - Alexander Layton QC acts as expert witness
  • 20 Essex Street
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • May 11 2018

In March 2017 the EU Justice Sub-Committee published its report 'Brexit: justice for families, individuals and businesses?' looking at what


High Court rules on the "reasonable period" in Article 39(2) VCDR, during which diplomatic privileges and immunities will continue to operate
  • 20 Essex Street
  • United Kingdom
  • May 3 2018

In A Local Authority v X and Others 2018 EWHC 874 (Fam) Mrs Justice Gwynneth Knowles was required to consider the nature, purpose and duration of


Rusal sanctions: market turmoil and legal fall-out
  • 20 Essex Street
  • USA
  • April 24 2018

April 2018 has seen the metals markets thrown into turmoil by the US imposition of sanctions on United Company Rusal. Any party in doubt as to whether


'Cyber-seaworthiness: the calm before the storm?'
  • 20 Essex Street
  • United Kingdom
  • April 18 2018

Will we soon see claims for compensation resulting from cyber-attacks in the maritime sector? 2017 saw a significant stepping up of global cyber-crime


Judgment: Kyokuyo Co Ltd v A P Møller-Maersk AS trading as "Maersk Line" ("The Maersk Tangier")
  • 20 Essex Street
  • United Kingdom
  • April 17 2018

Today, 17 April 2018, the Court of Appeal (Gloster and Flaux LJJ) handed down judgment in this important carriage of goods case concerned with