• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Research tools
    • Global research hub
    • Lexy
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner
    • Research reports
  • Resources
  • Research tools
  • Learn
    • All
    • Masterclasses
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

First ever pre-litigation preliminary injunction order issued in trade secret case

Baker McKenzie

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

China February 28 2014

In early January, the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court issued
China’s first ever pre-litigation preliminary injunction in a dispute between
a Chinese subsidiary of a large multinational pharmaceutical company
and its ex-manager. This is the same court that issued China’s first ever
preliminary injunction in a trade secrets case in July 2013, though in that
case the preliminary injunction was applied for after the plaintiff had
formally brought a civil claim against the ex-employee.
In this case, the ex-employee downloaded 879 documents containing trade
secrets from the company’s database after he submitted a resignation
letter to the company. He later joined a competitor of the company. The
company then filed for a (pre-litigation) preliminary injunction against
the ex-employee before the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court,
seeking to restrain the ex-employee from disclosing, using, or allowing
others to use the documents containing trade secrets and related
confidential information. The court accepted the petition on the same day
and issued a preliminary injunction order within 48 hours thereafter.
The chief judge in this case later commented that the court made the
ruling based on five main factors: whether or not the claim was totally
frivolous, the potential threat of irreparable damage or injury to the
petitioner, a balancing of potential costs/harms of each party, the urgency
of the petition, and the public interest. The chief judge, however, did not
mention whether the likelihood of success on the merits of the underlying
trade secrets case was relevant to the decision.
Under the Amended PRC Civil Procedure Law, the court is required to
rule, within 48 hours, on any pre-litigation preliminary injunction petition.
By contrast, if a preliminary injunction petition is made during an ongoing
litigation, the courts are only required to act where the circumstances are
urgent.
This case again shows the willingness of Shanghai courts to grant
preliminary injunctive remedies in trade secret cases. As courts become
more experienced in handling similar cases, it can be hoped that they
will also issue preliminary injunctive orders in other types of civil cases,
possibly including breach of non-compete cases. However, courts in other
cities, such as Beijing, have yet to follow Shanghai’s lead.

Content is provided for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. For more information, please visit: www.bakermckenzie.com/en/client-resource-disclaimer.

Baker McKenzie - Andreas W. Lauffs, Joseph W. Deng and Jonathan M. Isaacs

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • China
  • Designs and trade secrets
  • Litigation
  • Baker McKenzie

Topics

  • Preliminary injunction

Popular articles from this firm

  1. China REITs: New guidelines for acquisitions and equity fundraising by PRC infrastructure REITs, and expanded coverage for affordable rental housing *
  2. China: Employment Newsletter | January 2023 *
  3. At a glance: patent enforcement proceedings in China *
  4. COVID-19 Government Intervention Schemes *
  5. May 2017 International Trade Compliance Update *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: Drafting a sale and supply of goods agreement (USA) Recently updated
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to assess competition law risks in an agency agreement (UK) Recently updated
  • Checklist Checklist: When and how to appoint a data protection officer (UK)
View all

Related research hubs

  • China
  • Litigation
  • Designs and trade secrets
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2023 Law Business Research

Law Business Research