While President Donald Trump’s choice to lead the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is awaiting Congressional confirmation, key agency decision makers are listening to the construction industry.

J. Gary Hill, Chairman of National Association of Home Builders’ Construction Health and Safety Committee, had testified before a House Committee on the “regulatory tsunami” OSHA unleashed in recent years. He suggested ways the agency can streamline and clarify workplace safety rules and reinvigorate relationships with industry experts through its Alliance program and OSHA’s Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health.

OSHA held a listening tour, asking industry stakeholders about how to enhance its compliance assistance efforts. On the day of the Congressional hearing, OSHA’s top official met with industry leaders to discuss agency plans to boost voluntary compliance.

Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta confirmed OSHA’s new approach. He assured workplace safety experts that “we’re not interested in playing a game of gotcha …. [T]he goal is to help the individual or the company that is trying in good faith to comply.”

OSHA appears to be changing the way it does business.

Today, OSHA is readdressing the controversial electronic recordkeeping requirements enacted in the waning days of the Obama Administration. Construction stakeholders have long expressed concerns about the risk of potentially disclosing private employee information. They also questioned the benefit of making injury information public.

In response, OSHA reopened its rulemaking process. It proposed eliminating the requirement that employers electronically submit the highly detailed incident information on their OSHA 300 Logs and 301 Forms. Instead, OSHA proposed requiring employers to provide only aggregated summary information on the OSHA 300A Form. (See our article, OSHA Recordkeeping: OSHA Only Requiring Electronic Submission of 300A Forms.)

Finally, construction and other industry stakeholders increasingly have voiced concerns to regulators and lawmakers that OSHA airs one-sided news releases when it cites companies. They pointed out that there is no “unsend” button for news releases based on facts an inspector got wrong. While OSHA has not abandoned the practice, it has noticeably taken a more reserved approach lately.