• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Research tools
    • Global research hub
    • Lexy
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner
    • Research reports
  • Resources
  • Research tools
  • Learn
    • All
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

German Parliament approves national Data Retention Act

Baker McKenzie

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

Germany November 6 2015

Hot Topics German Parliament approves national Data Retention Act On November 6, 2015, the German Bundesrat approved a bill on the introduction of a national Data Retention Act ("DRA"). Following the Bundesrat's approval, the bill is now sent to the Federal President who will most likely sign it. Therefore, the DRA will likely enter into force before the end of November. The DRA introduces data retention obligations for providers of publicly available telecommunications services (PECS). However, the retention obligations vary depending on the provided service: Providers of publicly available telephone services (PATS) must store certain traffic data for 10 weeks. This includes:  the telephone number or another identifier of all parties involved;  date and time of the beginning and the end of the call including time zone;  information on the used service if the PATS enables the use of various services;  in case of mobile phone services: - the international identifier of the calling and called party, - the international identifier of the calling and called device, and - date and time including time zone of the first activation of pre-paid services;  in case of internet telephony: also the IP addresses of the calling and called parties including allocated user identifiers. Providers of publicly available internet access services ("ISPs") must store certain traffic data for 10 weeks. This includes:  the IP address allocated to the subscriber;  a unique identifier of the used internet connection as well as the allocated user identifier;  date and time of the beginning and the end of the internet access under the allocated IP address including the time zone. In addition, providers must store location data generated by the use of mobile phone services for 4 weeks. If a provider does not generate or process the respective data itself, it must ensure that the data is stored properly by a third party. Upon request, it must also promptly inform the Federal Network Agency ("FNA") about the data processor's identity. Information Technology and Communications Germany November 6, 2015 Our Expertise Information Technology and Communications 2 Hot Topics Providers may use the respective data only for the transmission to specific law enforcement authorities as defined and to extent specifically permitted by law. They must retain the data in such a way that information requests by these authorities can be answered immediately. To this end, the DRA contains an express obligation to store the data to be retained under the DRA on a server in Germany. After expiry of the respective retention period, the data must be deleted without undue delay but at the latest within one week. Non-compliance with the retention obligations is subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 500,000. If the financial benefit derived from the breach exceeds the aforementioned amounts, the fines may be even higher (skimming of profits). Furthermore, the FNA can take "appropriate" regulatory measures including – as last resort measure and subject to the principle of proportionality – prohibiting the provision of the PECS in question. Similar legislation had already been enacted in 2007, but was invalidated by the German Constitutional Court for violation of the constitutional guaranty of the telecommunications secrecy pursuant to Art. 10 of the German Constitution. Furthermore, on April 8, 2014, the European Court of Justice invalidated the Data Retention Directive (which was the legal basis for national data retention legislation across the EU) for violation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Despite these court rulings, the German Government takes the view that the new DRA will pass the constitutional test. However, critics have already announced that they will challenge the DRA before the German Constitutional Court once it has been enacted. It remains to be seen whether the DRA will be considered as constitutional. Until then, however, the DRA will be enforceable and the providers will have to comply with it. For further information, please contact: Prof. Dr. Joachim Scherer, LL.M. E-Mail: [email protected] Dr. Holger Lutz, LL.M. E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Hot Topics Baker & McKenzie - Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten, Wirtschaftsprüfern und Steuerberatern mbB Berlin Friedrichstrasse 88 / Unter den Linden 10117 Berlin Tel.: +49 (0) 30 2 20 02 81 0 Fax: +49 (0) 30 2 20 02 81 199 Frankfurt/Main Bethmannstrasse 50-54 60311 Frankfurt/Main Tel.: +49 (0) 69 2 99 08 0 Fax: +49 (0) 69 2 99 08 108 Dusseldorf Neuer Zollhof 2 40221 Dusseldorf Tel.: +49 (0) 211 3 11 16 0 Fax: +49 (0) 211 3 11 16 199 Munich Theatinerstrasse 23 80333 Munich Tel.: +49 (0) 89 5 52 38 0 Fax: +49 (0) 89 5 52 38 199 www.bakermckenzie.com Get Connected: This client newsletter is prepared for information purposes only. The information contained therein should not be relied on as legal advice and should, therefore, not be regarded as a substitute for detailed legal advice in the individual case. The advice of a qualified lawyer should always be sought in such cases. In the publishing of this Newsletter, we do not accept any liability in individual cases. Baker & McKenzie - Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten, Wirtschaftsprüfern und Steuerberatern mbB is a professional partnership under German law with its registered office in Frankfurt/Main, registered with the Local Court of Frankfurt/Main at PR No. 1602. It is associated with Baker & McKenzie International, a Verein organized under the laws of Switzerland. Members of Baker & McKenzie International are Baker & McKenzie law firms around the world. In common with terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a professional who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm. © Baker & McKenzie

Content is provided for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. For more information, please visit: www.bakermckenzie.com/en/client-resource-disclaimer.

Baker McKenzie - Joachim Scherer and Holger Lutz

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • Germany
  • IT & Data Protection
  • Baker McKenzie

Organisations

  • Bundestag

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Monitoring of employee email and internet use in Germany - guidance from data protection authorities *
  2. NFTs in metaverse gaming: Taking a view on Regulatory, IP and Transactional implications from a German law perspective *
  3. Germany: "Virtual import" of medicines from Switzerland to Germany ("Swiss invoicing") ruled illegal *
  4. „Das Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz - neuer Standard für menschenrechtliche und umweltbezogene Sorgfaltspflichten globaler Lieferketten“ *
  5. Outsourcing in Germany *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to determine and apply relevant US privacy laws to your organization (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: Privacy and data security law training (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: Completing a data and information security risk assessment (USA)

Related research hubs

  • Germany
  • IT & Data Protection
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2022 Law Business Research

Law Business Research