On June 16 2016 Delaware Governor Jack Markell signed into law House Bill 371, which amends the Delaware General Corporation Law with respect to, among other things, appraisal proceedings and intermediate-form mergers.
Specifically, the bill amends Section 262 of the law to limit de minimis appraisal claims and to provide surviving corporations with the right to pay stockholders exercising appraisal rights before the Delaware Court of Chancery makes a final value determination, thereby limiting the amount of interest that accrues on an appraisal award.
The legislation also clarifies the requirements and procedures relating to intermediate-form mergers under Section 251(h) of the law, particularly those involving rollover of target equity.
The amendments became effective on August 1 2016. The amendments to Section 262 affecting appraisal proceedings are effective only with respect to appraisal proceedings arising out of transactions consummated pursuant to agreements entered into on or after August 1 2016 (or, in the case of mergers pursuant to Section 253 of the law, resolutions adopted by a board of directors on or after August 1 2016; or, in the case of mergers pursuant to Section 267 of the law, authorisations provided on or after August 1 2016). The amendments to Section 251(h) regarding intermediate-form mergers are effective only with respect to merger agreements entered into on or after August 1 2016.
Under Section 262 of the law, stockholders of any corporation that is acquired in certain merger or consolidation transactions may exercise appraisal rights, subject to certain exceptions and to compliance with specified procedural requirements. The new legislation amends Section 262(g) to institute a de minimis exception whereby the chancery court must dismiss appraisal proceedings for all stockholders that assert their appraisal rights unless:
- the total number of shares entitled to appraisal exceeds 1% of the outstanding shares of the class or series eligible for appraisal;
- the value of the consideration provided in the merger or consolidation for the total number of shares seeking appraisal exceeds $1 million; or
- the merger was approved pursuant to Section 253 or Section 267 of the law.
These provisions prevent stockholders from demanding appraisal in cases where the number of their shares or the value of those shares is minimal. This de minimis exception applies only to shares that were listed on a national securities exchange immediately before the merger or consolidation.
Section 262(h) of the law provides that unless the chancery court determines otherwise for good cause, interest on an appraisal award always accrues from the effective date of the merger until the date of payment of the appraisal award at a rate of 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate, compounded quarterly. Surviving corporations already have the ability to propose agreements with appraisal petitioners to release all or a portion of the merger consideration and thereby to eliminate the running of statutory interest as to the amount released. Previously, however, surviving corporations could not require appraisal petitioners to accept such payments. The legislation now amends Section 262(h) to give the surviving corporation the right to make a voluntary cash payment to stockholders seeking appraisal before the chancery court's final judgment regarding fair value, thereby reducing the amount of interest that accrues during the appraisal process. If the surviving corporation makes a pre-payment, interest will accrue only on the sum of:
- the difference (if any) between the amount paid and the fair value of the shares as determined by the chancery court; and
- the interest that accrued before the pre-payment, unless paid at the time of the pre-payment.
The amount of any pre-payment is at the sole discretion of the surviving corporation and there is no inference that this amount is equal to, greater than or less than the fair value of the shares to be appraised.
By providing surviving corporations with the absolute right to pre-pay appraisal amounts and to cut off statutory interest, Delaware may have, at the margins, lessened the incentive for stockholders to bring or prolong appraisal actions.
Section 251(h) of the law provides a mechanism for an acquirer to consummate a two-step takeover (ie, a tender offer to purchase a majority of the shares of a public company followed by a second-step merger to acquire the remaining shares not tendered in the offer) without the need to obtain shareholder approval on the second-step merger, thereby avoiding the cost and delay involved in preparing and distributing a Schedule 14C Information Statement before the shareholder vote on the second-step merger. The amendments implemented by the legislation resolve various interpretive and practical issues that have arisen regarding the implementation of transactions structured to comply with Section 251(h), particularly those involving rollover of target equity.
The legislation clarifies that Section 251(h) is applicable to a corporation that has a class or series of stock listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 holders immediately before the execution of the merger agreement, even if not all classes or series of stock are so listed or held. The amendments also clarify that the offer for a target's stock may be consummated pursuant to separate offers for separate classes or series of stock.
In addition, the amendments to Section 251(h)(3) provide that, in order to determine whether the acquirer holds sufficient shares to approve the merger, it may include any rollover stock and shares of stock of the target held by any person that:
- owns – directly or indirectly – all outstanding stock of the offeror; or
- is a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of such person or persons (collectively, 'offeror affiliates').
'Rollover stock' is defined as any shares of stock of the target that are the subject of a written agreement requiring such shares to be transferred, contributed or delivered to the offeror or any offeror affiliate in exchange for stock or other equity interests in the offeror or any offeror affiliate, provided that such shares are transferred, contributed or delivered before the effective time of the merger. The amendments also clarify the circumstances under which certificated and uncertificated shares of stock of the target are deemed received for the purposes of Section 251(h)(3).
The amendments to Section 251(h)(5) provide that rollover stock and shares of the target that are owned at the commencement of the offer by the target, the offeror and any of their direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries may be excluded from conversion in the merger into the right to receive the merger consideration.
Section 111 of the law provides that any civil action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the provisions of various instruments, documents or agreements may be brought in the chancery court, except to the extent that a statute confers exclusive jurisdiction on a court, agency or tribunal other than the chancery court. The amendments expand the chancery court's jurisdiction to include civil actions involving any instrument, document or agreement:
- to which a corporation and one or more of its stockholders are parties and pursuant to which one or more stockholders sells or offers to sell any stock of the corporation; or
- by which a corporation agrees to sell, lease or exchange any of its property or assets and which provides that one or more stockholders approve of, or consent to, such sale, lease or exchange.
The amendments also include technical changes regarding the quorum and voting requirements for board committees and sub-committees, the execution of stock certificates and procedures to revoke dissolution or to restore or revive a corporation's certificate of incorporation.
For further information on this topic please contact John Sorkin or Marvin Tagaban at Ropes & Gray LLP's New York office by telephone (+1 212 596 9000) or email (email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org). Alternatively, contact Paul Kinsella at Ropes & Gray LLP's Boston office by telephone (+1 617 951 7000) or email (email@example.com). The Ropes & Gray LLP website can be accessed at www.ropesgray.com.
This article was first published by the International Law Office, a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. Register for a free subscription.