• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Research tools
    • Global research hub
    • Lexy
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner
    • Research reports
  • Resources
  • Research tools
  • Learn
    • All
    • Masterclasses
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

CFTC Adopts Final Rule Regarding Speculative Position Limits

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

USA December 22 2020

On October 15, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or the Commission) adopted final rules imposing speculative position limits in derivative contracts referencing 25 agricultural, metals and energy commodities (the Final Rules). These limits are the culmination of almost a decade of work from the Commission and its staff, including revising the rules after a federal court vacated its last attempt to expand speculative position limits in 2012.

The Final Rules are intended to “prevent excessive speculation” and broadly apply to positions in futures, options and economically equivalent swaps referencing the covered commodities (Covered Contracts). The Final Rules approach the exemption for bona fide hedges flexibly, to “accommodate potential future, unpredictable developments in commercial hedging practices.” This is in contrast to previous rule proposals, which were both more prescriptive and restrictive. The Final Rules also exempt certain recognized spread transactions.

Although the Final Rules have a relatively distant compliance date (January 1, 2022, for futures contracts in the 16 commodities not subject currently to federal limits and January 1, 2023, for economically equivalent swaps), market participants should familiarize themselves with the Final Rules and their exemptions because many participants and intermediaries will likely find it necessary to establish internal control procedures, which may require systems development in advance of the Final Rules’ compliance date. The Commission has long prioritized enforcement actions based on violations of existing federal and exchange-set position limits, and we expect this focus to continue with the adoption of this broadened speculative position limits regime.

I. Relevant Background

Since its adoption in 1936, Section 4a of the of the Commodity Exchange Act has authorized the Commission to impose speculative position limits.1 Section 737 of the 2008 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act amended Section 4a to expand the Commission’s authority to impose speculative positions limits “as necessary.” The CFTC first attempted to adopt rules under this new authority in 2011.2 However, these rules were largely vacated by a federal court in 2012, after the court found the Commission had not appropriately determined that the position limits adopted were necessary to advance the statute’s goals

In the eight years following this setback, the CFTC proposed several iterations of revised speculative position limit rules that were designed to address the issues in the original 2011 rules. The first of the revised rules were noticed for comment in December 2013. In response to comments from market participants and other commenters, the Commission issued a supplemental proposal in June 2016, followed by a complete re-proposal in December of that year. In February 2020, the Commission issued a further revised proposal, which specifically found that the proposed position limits were necessary to prevent excessive speculation. The Final Rules adopt the February 2020 proposal with few material changes.

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP - Paul M. Architzel, Petal Walker, Matthew Beville and Nikki Austin

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Derivatives
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

Laws

  • Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)

Organisations

  • Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA)

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Defense Contractors Will Face Higher Risks as Spending Increases *
  2. Update: Supreme Court Dismisses Privilege Case after Hearing Arguments *
  3. A Look At The Legal Intersection Of AI And Life Sciences *
  4. Second Circuit Releases New Blaszczak Decision, Decides Case without Addressing "Personal Benefit" Issue for 18 USC § 1348 Cases *
  5. Proposed Changes to CMS Regulations May Impact False Claims Act Liability for Medicare Overpayments *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology
Primary sources PRO
  • Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)

    • View in Primary sources

Related practical resources PRO

  • Checklist Checklist: Conducting third party due diligence and managing third party bribery risk (UK)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to identify and prioritise competition law risk in your organisation (non-dominant and dominant organisations) (UK)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: Understanding penalties for breach of the Bribery Act 2010 (UK)
View all

Related research hubs

  • Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)
  • Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA)
  • USA
  • Derivatives
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2023 Law Business Research

Law Business Research