Any organization confronting a controversial issue, and especially a crisis, will need legal advice and public relations advice. That, however, is where the problem arises.

Lawyers and public relations professionals have different, and at times, conflicting goals. Legal wants to win the case or obtain the permit, but also to limit potential liability for a client. Limiting the liability of a client is a sound legal objective. The public relations professional wants to maintain the reputation of the organization and help shape the organizations message regarding the issue or a crisis so that opponents of that organization cannot shape the message in a negative way. In other words, the public relations professional wants to communicate. The PR teams want the organization to be able to continue to do what it does or sell what it sells.

The problem arises due to the fact that the sound legal goal of limiting liability often means shutting down an organizations statements about the very issue that threatens the organization.

“No comment” is always a safe legal strategy. The problem is that “no comment” is often a really bad public relations strategy.

It's a strategy that could hurt an organization’s ability to continue to do what it does or sell whatever product or service it sells – and ultimately its ability to survive.

While this conflict will never be avoided, it can and should be managed. The best way to do so is to get the legal and PR teams at the same table, establish on-going dialog with chains of communication and finally, be sure that both legal and PR ultimately answer to one point of contact.

The final piece – having legal and PR answer to one point of contact – is important because compromises between full and open communication and limiting liability will have to be made. While it’s the hope that the legal and public relations professionals can get to a middle ground themselves, they are often separate, independent firms that will likely stick to their goals and their engagement. Therefore, a member of the organization will need to weigh in and may have to tip the scales to decide which direction is best.

Throughout my career as a lawyer, I have bumped into this conflict between legal and public relations on numerous occasions. We formed NP Strategy as a subsidiary of Nexsen Pruet with the desire to better address this conflict and better provide the legal and public relations advice that is truly in the best interest of a client’s long-term success.

More about Leighton Lord As a businessman, Leighton Lord has critical first‐hand experience in running a large business, managing people, and building consensus. Currently, Leighton is founder and Managing Director of Nexsen’s communications affiliate, NP Strategy, LLC. At the age of 42, he was elected Managing Partner of Nexsen Pruet, making him one of the youngest managing partners of a major law firm.

More about NP Strategy NP Strategy, a subsidiary of Nexsen Pruet, serves businesses and organizations that are launching projects, facing a crisis, trying to manage media issues and looking to expand in the Carolinas. The NP Strategy team are business professionals who have held leadership positions in corporations, as well as public policy and governmental organizations. They have have managed newsrooms in some of the largest cities in the United States and run statewide corporate communication departments. To learn more about the team, visit www.NPStrat.com/Team.

Article originally published at www.MidlandsBiz.com - July 6, 2018.