The ECJ upheld the CFI’s finding that the mark was devoid of any distinctive character (Article 7(1)(b)) and was descriptive of the relevant goods and services (Article 7(1)(c)).
Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com
Register
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.
Don Sangster
”Lexology is a useful and informative tool. I keep copies of relevant articles and often forward them to colleagues. Although I do not know all of the authors/firms, by reading their articles I do gain an understanding of their appreciation of a topic, and should the need arise I would not hesitate to contact them on those topics.”
