On May 6, 2016, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”) published its proposed revisions to the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (“BGEPA”) permit program. The stated intention of these proposed revisions is to improve upon the 2009 regulations establishing a permit program under BGEPA. In 2012, the Service issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public input on aspects of the 2009 regulations. In addition to updating the best available science regarding eagle populations, conservation measures and causes of eagle mortality, the proposed revisions seek to include input received from the public about aspects of the 2009 regulations that could be improved. Notably, the revisions introduce of the concept of practicability to the permit issuance criteria, address compensatory mitigation requirements, and emphasize local populations in the “Preservation Standard,” among other changes. Also notably, the proposed revisions reintroduce the maximum permit duration of 30-years. In 2013, the Service issued an amendment to the 2009 eagle regulations extending the 5-year maximum term to 30-years. In 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California invalidated the amendment extending the term of BGEPA permits on National Environmental Policy Act grounds. Comments on the proposed rule will be accepted through July 5, 2016.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact email@example.comRegister
Long Awaited Eagle Rule Revamp Out for Public Comment
Endangered Species Law and Policy
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Related topic hubs
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc
"I am a regular reader of Lexology, as are a few of my colleagues. I find the email newsfeed useful and of good quality, and in some cases directly on point with issues of concern to the company. It is important to stay current with legal developments, and the articles are a great aid toward this goal. The ability to access the articles without cost is critical and I hope Lexology continues with the good work."