Revised regulations to prescribe and clarify the electronic services (e-services) supplied by foreign suppliers to South African consumers which are subject to VAT were proposed in 2018, which significantly broadened the scope of ‘e-services’. The Minister of Finance, in the 2019 Budget Review then announced that further amendments would be made to the e-services regulations to address certain oversights
On 18 March 2019, the revised ‘final’ regulations were published in the Government Gazette prescribing what constitutes ‘electronic services’ as contemplated in the VAT Act. The revised regulations will come into effect on 1 April 2019.
Background and entry requirements
South Africa does not have any place of supply rules to aide in the determination of which jurisdiction has taxing rights in respect of supplies made by foreign suppliers to South African customers. South Africa therefore introduced legislation providing a place of supply rule specific to e-commerce transactions for the first time with effect from 1 June 2014, which required foreign suppliers of e-services to register as VAT vendors in South Africa.
Foreign suppliers of e-services are deemed to be carrying on an enterprise in South Africa if at least two of the following requirements are met:
- the recipient of the services is a South African resident;
- the payment for services originates from a South African bank account; or
- the recipient has a business, residential, or postal address in South Africa.
Foreign suppliers of e-services will accordingly be required to register as VAT vendors in South Africa to the extent that they make taxable supplies of electronic services in excess of the VAT registration threshold. With effect from 1 April 2019, the registration threshold for supplies of e-services will be increased from R50,000 in a 12-month period to R1 million in a 12-month period.
The revised regulations remove the various specific categories of e-services listed in the current regulations and serves to widen the scope of the regulations to apply to any services supplied by means of an ‘electronic agent’, ‘electronic communication’ or the ‘internet’ for any consideration. These terms are in turn defined with refence to the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, No 25 of 2002 (ECTA).
The effect of the amendment is that virtually all services that are supplied by way of electronic means such as, for example, cloud computing, computer software and any online services, are now included as ‘electronic services’.
Specifically excluded from the scope of the regulations are supplies of regulated educational services, telecommunication services, and certain supplies between ‘group companies’ as that term is defined. Furthermore, supplies which would ordinarily be exempt from VAT if supplied in South Africa, for example, financial services, will not fall within the scope of the e-services regulations even if supplied by electronic means.
It is interesting to note that the previous draft regulations published during November 2018 provided a detailed definition of what constituted ‘telecommunication services’ for purposes of the regulations. This definition has however been removed, and the revised regulations now simply define ‘telecommunication services’ with reference to the ECTA. This is rather peculiar on the basis that the term ‘telecommunication services’ is not defined in the ECTA. It seems that this may have been an oversight by National Treasury and it is expected that this should be amended in due course.
If one considers the broad definition of e-services, ie ‘any services supplied by means of an ‘electronic agent’, ‘electronic communication’ or the ‘internet’, it is not clear whether information or advice which is communicated via an e-mail transmitted electronically falls within the ambit of the regulation. “Electronic communication” is defined in the ECTA to mean ‘a communication by means of data messages’, and “data messages” is defined to mean ‘data generated, sent, received or stored by electronic means’. On the face of it, it seems that information or advice communicated via e-mail will therefore fall within the scope of e-services. The Explanatory Memorandum stipulates, however, that one of the policy intentions behind the amendments is to subject to VAT those services that are provided using minimal human intervention. It provides as an example that legal advice prepared outside of South Africa by a non-resident and sent to a recipient in South Africa via e-mail will not be subject to the regulations. Notwithstanding the statement made in the Explanatory Memorandum, it remains that the Explanatory Memorandum does not have any legal status and SARS should preferably clarify and confirm this policy intention by means of a binding general ruling so as to avoid any future disputes in this regard.
A welcome revision of the regulations is the relaxation of the rules relating to intra-group supplies. In terms of the regulations, e-services supplied between group companies are excluded from the scope of the regulations. However, in terms of the initial proposed definition of the term ‘group of companies’ contained in the previous draft regulations, it was required that the local recipient company must be the wholly owned subsidiary of the foreign group company for the exclusion to apply. Consequently, if the local company has minority shareholders such as Black Economic Empowerment or employee incentive scheme shareholders, the exclusion would not have applied. This issue was identified and the definition of ‘group of companies’ was amended and relaxed to require a 70% shareholding in the local recipient company by the foreign holding company. It is important to note that to qualify for the exclusion, the foreign company must supply the e-services to the local recipient company itself.
Business-to-Business (B2B) transactions
At the time of introducing the e-services regulations for the first time in June 2014, National Treasury stated that the regulations do not impose a new tax, but merely shifts the tax liability from the local recipient of the e-services to the foreign supplier thereof, so as to address concerns about non-compliance with the reverse charge mechanism, and to level the playing field between local and foreign suppliers of e-services.
The regulations were accordingly first introduced to address concerns about non-compliance by recipients of imported services. The concept of ‘imported services’ specifically excludes services acquired for purposes of making taxable supplies. By including B2B transactions, the regulations create a disparity between supplies of e-services and supplies of any other services by foreign suppliers. The supplies of any other services are only taxed as imported services if they are acquired for purposes other than making taxable supplies. The reasoning provided by National Treasury in the Explanatory Memorandum is that the exclusion of B2B transactions would create an unfair cash flow advantage for foreign suppliers. This reasoning however does not seem to have any basis because services rendered by foreign suppliers to businesses using the services for taxable supplies are not subject to VAT under the imported services provisions in the first place.
The inclusion of B2B transactions in the scope of the e-services regulations therefore deviates from the initial intention expressed by National Treasury at the time of introducing the regulations during June 2014. The inclusion of B2B transactions brings foreign suppliers who supply electronic services to local business for purposes of making taxable supplies into the South African VAT net.
It is questionable as to what benefit would accrue to the fiscus on B2B transactions if the net impact on the fiscus is nil, as any VAT charged by the supplier will be deductible as input tax by the recipient, coupled with the increased administration for both the South African Revenue Service (SARS) and the foreign supplier who will now need to register as a vendor and submit monthly VAT returns to SARS.
The inclusion of B2B transactions is also contrary to the recommendations of the Davis Tax Committee (DTC). The DTC recommended that the treatment of e-services should be aligned with international treatment and especially harmonised with OECD principles. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in its International VAT/GST Guidelines (2017), recommends that a distinction be drawn between B2B and B2C (Business-to-Consumer) transactions. The OECD recommends that a customer should be liable to account for any tax due under the reverse charge mechanism where that is consistent with the overall design of the national VAT system. The OECD goes on to state that the application of the reverse charge mechanism in this instance has a number of advantages, including, inter alia, reducing the administrative costs for the tax authority because the supplier will not be required to comply with tax obligations in the customer’s jurisdiction, for example, VAT identification, audits and the costs associated with administering language barriers. Notwithstanding the DTC’s and the OECD’s recommendation that B2B transactions be excluded so as to ensure global harmonisation of the VAT principles, it seems that National Treasury has chosen to disregard these recommendations.
Intermediaries who facilitate the supply of e-services or who provide their platforms to foreign suppliers for rendering the e-services to South African customers, and who are responsible for invoicing and collecting payment for the e-services, are also required to register for VAT in South Africa. Accordingly, where a foreign supplier supplies e-services via an intermediary, the intermediary will be deemed to be the supplier of the services where such intermediary facilitates the supply of the e-services and is responsible for the issuing of the invoice and collection of the payment.
The VAT Act provides for suppliers of electronic services to apply to SARS, to account for VAT on the payments basis as opposed to the invoice basis. However, this dispensation has not been extended to intermediaries who facilitate the supply of e-services.
Registration as a vendor
A foreign supplier of e-services who makes taxable supplies in excess of R1 million in a 12-month period will be liable to register as a South African VAT vendor with effect from 1 April 2019.
A simplified VAT registration process has been introduced for foreign e-services suppliers. The VAT 101 Application form may be downloaded from the SARS website. The application must be completed in English and emailed together with the requisite supporting documents to SARS. It is important to note that foreign suppliers of e-services will not be required to have a South African banking account for purposes of registering as a vendor.
Detailed guidance regarding the registration process as well as guidance on completing a VAT201 return is provided for in the SARS VAT Registration Guide for Foreign Suppliers of Electronic Services available on the SARS website.
SARS has also issued a detailed document titled ‘Frequently Asked Questions: Supplies of Electronic Services’(FAQs) in which it provides answers to various questions regarding the e-services regulations. SARS has stated that the FAQs will be updated periodically to address questions regarding the revised regulations and as such it is not envisaged that VAT rulings in relation to the revised regulations will be issued. A dedicated mailbox (VATElectronic@sars.gov.za) has been set up to field any questions not already answered in the FAQs. The FAQ document is available on the SARS website.
The regulations come into effect on 1 April 2019. The revised regulations have only been gazetted in their final form on 18 March 2019 providing foreign suppliers of e-services who now fall within the ambit of the revised regulations and who have not registered as yet, with just two weeks to register for VAT in South Africa and to update their systems so as to comply with their obligation to account for VAT on e-services supplied in South Africa with effect from 1 April 2019.
A person who is liable to register and fails to do so is guilty of an offence and is liable to a fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years. Furthermore, a person may also be subject to further penalties for failure to register, as well as penalties and interest on output tax not accounted for from the time such person first became liable to register. Foreign suppliers of e-services should therefore carefully consider their VAT registration obligations in South Africa and should ensure that they comply with the revised regulations and VAT legislation.