Panacea Consulting, Inc., Comp. Gen. Dec. B-299307.4 et al., Jul. 27, 2007.
For one of the task order awards, the record did not include any explanation of the bases for assigning point scores, such as an indication of any evaluated strengths or weaknesses supporting the scores. For the other task order, all of the evaluation scoresheets were prepared by a single evaluator, contained only brief, often cryptic, notations regarding the basis for the assigned scores, and were incomplete. There also were several unexplained scoring anomalies – such as the assignment of 13 points under an evaluation subfactor with a maximum of only ten available points. Moreover, the record contained no source selection decision document for either task order award.