On May 18, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an employer that paid pension benefits, which were calculated in part under an accrual rule that was only applied prior to the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) but which gave less retirement credit for pregnancy leave than it did for medical leave did not violate the PDA.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact [email protected]
RegisterHigh Court rules employer did not violate the Pregnancy Discrimination Act
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
USA
May 18 2009
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiri[email protected].
Related research hubs
Peter Rosenbloom
Labor & Employment Counsel
The Boeing Company
What our clients say
"The newsfeeds are extremely relevant. They address both legislative and judicial updates and offer an experienced, thoughtful analysis of directions or trends. The articles are all extremely well done and provide a practical viewpoint, not just an academic one. Most topics have at least 3-5 articles from various law firms, so there's an opportunity to read different perspectives and analyses."