We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Twitter
  • Login
  • Events
  • Popular articles
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Analytics
  • Track
  • Discover
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Analytics
  • Track
  • Discover
  • Events
  • Popular articles
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
Back Forward
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Save
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

New requirements under Senate Bill 1137, California’s foreclosure reform law

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA September 18 2008

In July, the California State Legislature enacted SB 1137 as an urgency measure designed to address the adverse effects of the state's high forclosure rate.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP - <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pillsburylaw.com/angela.yates">Angela M. Yates</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pillsburylaw.com/diane.young">Diane Bazan Young</a>
Back Forward
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Save
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

Filed under

  • USA
  • Banking
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Tagged with

  • California
  • Foreclosure
  • California State Legislature
  • Adverse effect

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Understanding Business Interruption Insurance and Wide-Impact Catastrophes *
  2. Hurricanes Harvey and Irma: 8 Key Insurance Coverage Issues Impacting the Availability and Amount of Recovery *
  3. Drafting a better choice-of-law clause *
  4. Disclose or Else: FTC Steps Up Prosecution of Social Media Influencers *
  5. Ninth Circuit Weighs in on “Field and Obstacle Preemption,” Reversing District Court’s Finding of Preemption *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Prospector
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. USA
  2. Banking

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions: M&A

  1. USA
  2. Malaysia
  3. Peru
  4. More...

"Lexology is a quick and useful indicator of developments in the legal sphere. It alerts me to changes taking place in the legal environment in South Africa that I may not otherwise have spotted or had immediate access...

"Lexology is a quick and useful indicator of developments in the legal sphere. It alerts me to changes taking place in the legal environment in South Africa that I may not otherwise have spotted or had immediate access to as a company lawyer. It definitely serves as a trigger for me to investigate such changes in the legal landscape in South Africa as they may affect my work and that of my employer. I believe that receiving Lexology provides me with a competitive advantage."

Dr Jürgen Fegbeutel
Legal Services Director
BMW (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd

Back to Top
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Testimonials
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 -2017 Globe Business Media Group