In London Arbitration 1/08-734 LMLN 2, the vessel was chartered on the Asbatankvoy Form. There were two inconsistent clauses in the charterparty relating to pier dues: printed Clause 12 providing that charges would be for charterers’ account, and additional typed Clause 3 reading that charges would be for owners’ account. As a matter of construction, therefore, the term specifically agreed by the parties by way of amendment to the standard form was to be given precedence, as was the provision which appeared later in the contract, both of which led to the conclusion that the dues in question were for owners’ account.